Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MORENO BRIONES Patricio A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% |
| 2 | PAI Dong-Ying | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
| 3 | HABALA Peter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | |
| 3 | TANG Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 5 | PHILLIPS Jasper | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | < 1% |
| 6 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% |
| 7 | EPPLY-SCHMIDT Paul | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
| 8 | PAVLOVICH Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 9 | POWERS Douglas A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
| 10 | CHO Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% | 3% |
| 11 | DARRICAU Henri J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 12 | GONZALEZ Eric J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 25% |
| 13 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 15% | 1% |
| 14 | KOEHN Ted | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 19% | |
| 15 | STURGIS Bruce T. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | PASHBY Stephen N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 10% | - |
| 17 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% |
| 18 | LAWRENCE John W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 29% |
| 19 | FADL Omar | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
| 20 | ROBINSON Timothy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 22% | 3% |
| 21 | POPOKH Leo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 1% | |
| 22 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 8% |
| 23 | VALENTINE Iain | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 16% | - |
| 24 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
| 25 | ESTELL Oscar M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
| 26 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 1% | |
| 27 | GRAJALES Nestor L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 13% |
| 28 | PATTERSON Malcolm (Werewolf) D. | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | GREEN Michael C. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 30 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | TOMASI John | 100% | 80% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 32 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | JOHANSON David B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | - |
| 34 | WILBERT Matt | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 35 | DRAKE David L. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | SCHOENACK Jason A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 37 | LEYLAND John | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 38 | RUSANOV Oleg | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 100% | 97% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 40 | WU Clarence C. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | KLEIN Johannes | 100% | 95% | 68% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 100% | 94% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | HILL David E. | 100% | 56% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 44 | BRYKCZYNSKI James V. | 100% | 100% | 85% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | MELCHIOR Donald L. | 100% | 68% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 47 | ALLAN Peter L. | 100% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | PROCOPIO Gregory M. | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | KAZIMIROFF Paul B. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | PRECCIOZZI Aldo F. | 100% | 87% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | 100% | 74% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | NEWELL Tim | 100% | 71% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | WEMPLE Charles | 100% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.