Pasadena Convention Center - Visitors Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CANLAS Nathan | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | DINSAY Kristjan | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
3 | RASMUSSEN Sage | V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
3 | PONS Diego | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
5 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
6 | YI William | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
7 | ZHANG Matthew | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
8 | TONKOVICH Ryan | D V V D V D | V V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
9 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
10 | LE Jacob H. | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
11 | ZHANG Jacob | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
12 | BAKER Ethan | V V V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
13 | LAM Nicolas | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
14 | PARK Ryan | D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
15 | ZHANG Aaron | V V V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
16 | CHOI Ethan | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
17 | DERRICK Blake | V V V V V V | D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
18 | TSAY Jordan R. | V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
19 | BIELER Mason | V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
20 | DENG David | D V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
21 | BAE Eugene | D V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
22 | KAWADA Sebastien | V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
23 | MORTON Joshua | V D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
24 | TULYAG Azim | D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
25 | TSOI Spencer | V V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
26 | CHEN Matthew | V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
27 | PINCHENG Yao | D V V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
28 | ZHAN Kevin | V D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
29 | SEIGEL Duncan | V D D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
30 | LING Carson Jr | V D D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
31 | BORG Matthew | D V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
32 | PE Noah | D D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
33 | PARK David | V D V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
34 | MORROW Brenden | D V D V V | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
35 | CHANG Nathan | V D V V D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
36 | FOY Grant | D D V V D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
37 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
38 | DANIEL Nikith | D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
39 | DULAI Agam | D D D V V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
40 | ZHOU Austin | V V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
41 | SHORTER David Alexander | D D D V V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
42 | HUANG Nathan | V D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
43 | PARK Roy | D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
44 | FLANAGAN Miles | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
45 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
46 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | D D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
47 | LEE Daniel | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
48 | DULAI Angad | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
49 | DACKO Nolan | D V D D D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
50 | VAQUILAR Felix L. | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
51 | GUO Joey | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
52 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
53 | GALLO Michael | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
54 | SHARDONOFSKY Keelan | D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
55 | TURNER Finian | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
56 | WU Thomas | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
57 | DROPKIN Mason | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
58 | DEJOURNETT Jacob | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.