Pasadena Convention Center - Visitors Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Howard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
2 | LI linze | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
3 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% |
3 | RONG Jasper | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | |
5 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
6 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
7 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
8 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
9 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
10 | LIU Yijin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
11 | BROCK Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 8% |
12 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 11% |
13 | LEE Nathan Uju | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | 3% |
14 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 1% |
15 | ARISTOV Ilya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 15% |
16 | ZHANG KAIQI | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
17 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
18 | CHEN Cooper | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% | < 1% |
19 | WINTERSET Mason | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
20 | BURRES kenneth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
21 | CHI Everett | 100% | 97% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
22 | WANG Edward | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | - |
23 | BRIMMER Robert (Trey) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
24 | KROON Landon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
25 | WANG Kyle | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
26 | OU Rigel | 100% | 98% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
27 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
27 | MINASIAN Mason | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
29 | YPHANTIDES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | |
30 | KOZLOFF Wyatt | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
31 | LI Philip | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% | - |
32 | ZHANG Richard Y. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
33 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
34 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
35 | IM Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
36 | HAN Kyle | 100% | 97% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
37 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
38 | QI Jeremy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
39 | LIANG Preston | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
40 | SANDOVAL-BRIOSO Jakob | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
41 | SRIVATSAV Anay | 100% | 87% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
42 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
43 | LEE Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
44 | WARD Carter | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
45 | SRIVATSAV Ishaan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
46 | HIOE Aaron | 100% | 96% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
47 | LO Lei | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
47 | OLSEN Dane | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
49 | BRUM Charles E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
50 | CHIANG Tyson | 100% | 93% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
51 | LEE Bill King | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
52 | CHEN Boaz | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
52 | FREY Elias | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
54 | KOU Xiaoyi | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
55 | LI Ryan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
56 | SEE Ryan | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
57 | RYU Andrew Junsang | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
58 | CHIOU Aaron | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
58 | SUN Eon | 100% | 61% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
60 | LEE Matthew | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
61 | COOK Ridgely | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
62 | GRIFFIN Sid | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.