Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center - National Harbor, DC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
2 | LIN Zhi tong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
3 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 23% | |
3 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
5 | SHEN Emilia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
6 | YANG Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
7 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% |
8 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
9 | CALISE Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 40% |
10 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
10 | YANG Lingting | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
12 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 46% |
13 | CHO Emily (Euran) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 23% | |
14 | YURKOVA Mariia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% | |
15 | XIE Lillian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% |
16 | REN Kayley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 5% |
17 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
18 | BROWN Lola | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 39% | 7% | |
18 | FIELD Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
20 | PAULUS Sloane E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 10% |
21 | LAI Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% |
22 | FIELD Julianna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
23 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% |
23 | SWANSON Alexa | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
25 | DAVIS Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
26 | SHIM Grace J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
27 | WANG Sophia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
28 | LI Han (Helina) | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
29 | WANG Joanna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
30 | ZHANG Soleil C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
31 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% | |
32 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
33 | LEE emily | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
34 | DENG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
35 | LIU Enjia sherry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 14% | |
36 | HU Jenna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
37 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 4% |
38 | YU Jane | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
39 | EVELAND Zoe | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
40 | DONG Emily | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
41 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 20% | |
42 | WEI Angela | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
43 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
44 | CHENG Isa | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
45 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
46 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
47 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 10% |
48 | ZHANG Selena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 4% |
49 | WANG CAROL | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
50 | JOO Natalie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | |
51 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
52 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
53 | LI Katerina | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
54 | KUMAMOTO Shino | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
55 | KAPOOR Saanvi | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
56 | SHAH Suhani | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
57 | BERGEL Daphne | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
58 | BURGESS Logan | 100% | 90% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | |
59 | CAMPBELL June | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | |
60 | SHENG Katherine | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
61 | SMITH Meghan | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
62 | DESERANNO Seren | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
63 | DONG Angela | 100% | 100% | 93% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - |
64 | COLLINS Anna | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
65 | HSIEH Sabrina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
66 | TANG Melody Fujiao | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - |
67 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
68 | LEE Alice | 100% | 89% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | |
69 | OWENS Elise | 100% | 99% | 87% | 41% | 8% | 1% | |
70 | GAO Anne | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
71 | TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
72 | MAJID Inaaya | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
73 | SHTEPA Rada | 100% | 59% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
74 | SHMUKLER Maria | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
75 | TAMIR Esu | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
76 | WANG DINA C. | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
77 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 100% | 50% | 7% | - | - | - | |
78 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
79 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 100% | 69% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
80 | AADHI Hansika | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
80 | BARCZAK Rebekah | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
82 | BORGES Valeryn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
83 | QUINTERO Camila | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
84 | MARKERT Delaney | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
85 | CHEN Sophie | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
86 | SHEBL Nadia | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
87 | CANO Sofia | 100% | 70% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
87 | GILLEN Makenna | 100% | 92% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | |
89 | SOHN Irene | 100% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
90 | SMITH katherine | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
91 | MORSE Katherine | 100% | 86% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
92 | TSIPORUKHA Sasha | 100% | 55% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
93 | OCAMPO Emily | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.