Salle Auriol Seattle - Seattle, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BULL Anderson | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% |
2 | WU Yiyang | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% |
3 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
3 | HUANG Zekai | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% | |
5 | PIISPANEN Eric A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 84% |
6 | HOOLE Colson | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 48% | 6% |
7 | GOLDIN Lucca | - | - | 2% | 20% | 49% | 29% | |
8 | STACKHOUSE Andre L. | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
9 | GRATHWOL-SEAR Oliver | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
10 | YERRAMILLI Tejas | - | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 3% |
11 | GOLDIN Nina | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% | - |
12 | MA Yanjie | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
13 | KING Robin E. | 4% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 3% | - | |
14 | NADEL Joshua | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
15 | LOPER Alex | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 21% | 3% | - |
16 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
17 | HOLMES Sabrina | 35% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
18 | SAKPAL Raghavi | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
19 | ZUG Kiersten A. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | - |
20 | MOODY Paul J. | - | 3% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
21 | DUNNELL Mahlon M. | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
22 | DEGEN Anita L. | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
23 | MARENTES Blanca E. | 8% | 46% | 42% | 4% | - | - | |
24 | GARRETT Ash | 2% | 21% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
25 | NAIR Supriya | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
26 | BARCZAY Sara E. | 37% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
27 | SECOR Solomon | 29% | 50% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.