Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CORNETT Sawyer R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% | |
| 2 | CLAYPOOL Conner | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 60% | 12% | |
| 3 | SON Eric | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | |
| 3 | SMITH Erick | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 5 | SMITH Brandon T. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 6 | PINKERTON Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
| 7 | WANG Jim | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
| 8 | DEMOSS Mercedes | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 9 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 15% |
| 10 | MARCUS Peter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 21% | |
| 11 | KOZINSKI Allison E. | 100% | 99% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 12 | LEE Claire L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | PRIJATEL John R. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 14 | SOARE Maria Elena | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 15 | HAAS Zane | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | HAZEL Susan L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 18 | BAILEY Lauren | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
| 19 | DEMOSS Sophia | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 20 | DENIHAN John | 100% | 95% | 64% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 21 | DICKSON Tim | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 5% | |
| 22 | BERNWANGER Phillip | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 23 | JAMES John | 100% | 94% | 63% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | DVORAK Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 25 | SIDARAS John | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.