The Durkan Rooster RYC/RJCC

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, September 20, 2025 at 10:00 AM

Register

Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2408 2991 - 2077
5 - 8 2043 2072 - 2010
9 - 16 1941 1997 - 1782
17 - 27 1608 1819 - 1112

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lin, James Gutkovskiy Fencing Academy A25 2991 2735.43
2 Zeng, Rick 5T Fencers Club B24 2364 2110.67
3 Edison, Ansel Massialas Foundation (M Team) C24 2198 1934.38
4 Tang, Royce 5T Fencers Club D25 2077 1824.55
5 Bakshi, Aman Fairfield County Fencing Academy AKA Fairfield Fencing Academy D25 2072 1812.30
6 Wong, Jacob Worldwide Fencing Academy C25 2057 1808.66
7 Grigoriev, Michael Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) E24 2033 1777.70
8 Xu, Nathan Moe Fencing Club LLC D25 2010 1760.35
9 Bai, Brian Top Fencing Club C24 1997 1734.43
10 Bai, Austin Top Fencing Club C25 1984 1730.60
11 Jazwinski, Ryan Gutkovskiy Fencing Academy D25 1982 1726.72
12 Shannon, Jack Manchen Academy Of Fencing C25 1981 1723.86
13 Xie, Jicheng 5T Fencers Club C25 1956 1695.66
14 Kim, Daniel Top Fencing Club E25 1943 1674.28
15 Martin, Mason Medeo Fencing Club C24 1901 1557.90
16 Kovacs, Harrison Gutkovskiy Fencing Academy D25 1782 1527.93
17 Holmes, Alexiy Fencing Academy Of Westchester D25 1819 1498.79
18 Ren, Ryan Star Fencing Academy U 1721 1468.35
19 Oh, Joshua East Coast Fencing Club D25 1749 1453.74
20 Tam, Kyle Moe Fencing Club LLC D25 1704 1429.33
21 Zhang, Ethan Medeo Fencing Club U 1675 1389.67
22 Zhang, Julian Medeo Fencing Club D25 1639 1345.21
23 Kaye, Ben E25 1589 1296.88
24 Diaz, Gabriel Gutkovskiy Fencing Academy E25 1565 1266.59
25 Xu, Ryan AIC Fencing Club E25 1645 1134.94
26 Kim, Aiden E24 1471 1010.16
27 Scheurer, Edwin Bucks County Academy Of Fencing - West U 1112 313.83

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!