The Durkan Rooster RYC/RJCC

Youth 10 Men’s Foil (Y10MF)

Saturday, September 20, 2025 at 1:00 PM

Register

Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1910 2370 - 1721
5 - 8 1616 1691 - 1545
9 - 16 1253 1660 - 997
17 - 28 1275 2500 - 678

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wu, Wallace Fencers Club Inc. E25 2370 2102.66
2 Huang, Dalynn Mid-Island Fencing Academy U 1801 1543.40
3 Cao, Aaron 5T Fencers Club U 1749 1463.90
4 Yang, Luca Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1721 1455.86
5 Tardiff, Owen Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1622 1332.89
6 Yoon, Mason Fencers Club Inc. U 1605 1267.82
7 Zhang, Eric Star Fencing Academy U 1545 1258.17
8 Su, Leihaoxuan Future Stars Fencing U 1691 1196.53
9 Geng, Vincent Star Fencing Academy U 1272 941.70
10 Jazwinski, Archer Gutkovskiy Fencing Academy U 1359 901.89
11 Chin, Iker South Brooklyn Fencing U 1660 890.02
12 Chen, Keegan Star Fencing Academy U 1206 818.19
13 Fang, Lionel Mid-Island Fencing Academy U 1149 802.70
14 Lu, Ethan Star Fencing Academy U 1226 784.83
15 Wu, Yulen Star Fencing Academy U 1155 761.96
16 Li, Ethan Gold Fencing Club U 997 634.62
17 KIM, ISAAC Top Fencing Club U 1107 604.30
18 KIM, JOSHUA Top Fencing Club U 1085 579.95
19 Lyshkouski, Daniil V Fencing Club U 1585 500.58
20 Lin, Alexander Brooklyn Bridge Fencing Club U 1131 493.44
21 Fan, Oscar Brooklyn Bridge Fencing Club U 898 405.03
22 Hwang, Samuel Gutkovskiy Fencing Academy U 1717 308.09
23 Del Valle-Lin, Julian Fencers Club Inc. U 923 195.77
24 Sobo, Samuel Fairfield County Fencing Academy AKA Fairfield Fencing Academy U 1079 3.60
25 poonia, aarav American Institute Of Fencing U 2500 < 0
26 Lin, Tyler Future Stars Fencing U 678 < 0
27 Reuben, Samuel Wallingford-Swarthmore Panthers U 1063 < 0
28 Zhu, Javen Future Stars Fencing U 1536 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!