Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 23% |
2 | KIM Minwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
3 | KIM Avery J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
3 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
5 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
6 | TAKEMARU Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
7 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
8 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
9 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
9 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
11 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
12 | MORREALE John | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 8% |
13 | WUN William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
14 | MURTHY Mukund | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
15 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
16 | STANLEY Hanno | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
17 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
18 | LAU Jeremy Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
19 | LILOV Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
20 | GHOSH Tuhin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
21 | WIND Nicky E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
22 | SZEWCZYK Thomas D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
23 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
24 | LEVIN Mark A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
25 | WALKER Robert Connor | 100% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
26 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
27 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
28 | LIN William | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
29 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
30 | LUO ZiRui | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
31 | TANG Albert | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
32 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
33 | CZAHA Balint | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
34 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
35 | SO Hananiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% |
36 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
37 | METTKE Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
38 | CHAN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
39 | CHEN Henry H. | 100% | 87% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
40 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
41 | LEDERER Justin W. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
42 | GANTA Vijay | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
43 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
44 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
45 | JUN Ryan | 100% | 85% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
46 | REDA Myles | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
47 | XU Eric | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
49 | PINKHASSIK Timothy M. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
50 | HAQ Kamran R. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
51 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
52 | MARTINEZ Justin | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
53 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
54 | TREJO Oliver | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
55 | WU Wilmund | 100% | 79% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
56 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
57 | COOK Aidan J. | 100% | 80% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
58 | VON TULGANBURG Cameron C. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
60 | SPRINGER Patrick | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
61 | GEORGE Daniel | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
62 | YAO Andy | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.