Glenview Park District - Glenview, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
2 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
3 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
3 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% |
5 | LU Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
6 | RUSSELL Paul | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 11% |
7 | OZAWA Taishi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
8 | LIU Yinhong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 14% |
9 | KNIBBE Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
10 | ZHOU Justin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
11 | TAN Xinlai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
12 | TATE Linus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 30% | 4% |
13 | FRASER Rhys | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
14 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
15 | SCHAUER Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
16 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
17 | DEPP Edward | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
18 | DIFRANK Avery | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
19 | ZHAO Jason | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
20 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
21 | WENGER Rowan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
22 | STINNETT Brady | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
23 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
24 | WENGER Liam | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
25 | WANG Caleb | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
26 | HONG Derek | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
27 | MCCONKEY Tristan | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
28 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
29 | DIFRANK Tae | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
30 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
31 | LARSON Vaughn | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
32 | SMITH Henry | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
33 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
34 | TURNER Jackson | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
35 | HICKEY Dylan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
36 | ZHANG Hanson | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
37 | ELTOFT Caden | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
38 | BALES Gabriel | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
39 | GOGOI Kavi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
40 | IBARRA Alejandro | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
41 | PAYNE Lynas | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
42 | ROMENESKO Bryce | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
43 | GONZALEZ Rocky | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
44 | BANNICK Evan | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
45 | MCGRATH Milo | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
46 | NG Gavin | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
47 | GREULICH Nikolas | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
48 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
49 | CHASE Crosby | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
50 | MARTIN Wesley | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
51 | LI Andy | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
51 | CRONK Trevor | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
53 | KOLACKI Gabriel | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
54 | SYMMANK Callen | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
55 | HALLETTMANES Ezra | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
56 | GOSTRYY Grigory | 100% | 99% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
57 | CHAN William | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
58 | GARRARD Jeremiah | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
58 | NOTHIAS Sebastien | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - |
60 | CARLSON Avery | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
61 | HILDEBRANDT Gerhard | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
61 | BANNICK Elliott | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.