Glenview Park District - Glenview, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CHUANG Oscar | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
2 | NEYMAN Sampson | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
3 | ZHAO Nathan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
3 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
5 | STRINGER David | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
6 | SLUSHER Gideon | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
7 | LU Alex | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
8 | WINGLER Cole | V V V V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
9 | MAVANI Krishna | V V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
10 | DESERANNO Leander | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
11 | RUSSELL Paul | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
12 | FRASER Rhys | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
13 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
14 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
14 | OZAWA Taishi | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
16 | HOWLAND Jonas | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
17 | ZHOU Justin | D V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
18 | KUE Temujin | V V V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
19 | LIU Yinhong | D V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
20 | WEISS Quintin | V V D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
21 | HEYBOER Jason | V V V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
22 | ZMUDA Aiden | V D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
23 | NAZARIO Dominic | V D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
24 | HICKEY Connor | V D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
25 | KNIBBE Nathan | V V D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
25 | TAN Xinlai | D D V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
27 | LATORRE Leonardo | D D D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
27 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | V D V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
29 | BALES Gabriel | V D D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
30 | DIFRANK Tae | V V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
31 | CHASE Crosby | D D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
32 | HERRERA Xavier | D D V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
33 | ROBINSON Ezekiel | V D V V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
34 | MCCONKEY Tristan | D V V V V D | D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
35 | FANG Haoyu | D D D V V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
36 | TATE Liam | V D D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
37 | KAGAN Noah | D V D V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
38 | PHONPRASANSACK Grayson | D V D V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
39 | MODADUGU Aryan | D V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
40 | IBARRA Alejandro | V D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
41 | WENGER Liam | D D D V D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
42 | ZHANG Hanson | D D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
43 | LINEBERRY CADEN | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
44 | TATE Linus | D V D D D D | D | 4.1 | 1 | -3.1 |
45 | GOGOI Kavi | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
46 | TURNER Jackson | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
46 | SMITH Henry | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
48 | MARTIN Wesley | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
49 | KOLACKI Gabriel | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
50 | MOLDOVEANU Roman | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
51 | BANNICK Evan | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
51 | SCHAUER Jack | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
53 | RYAN Nash | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
54 | RYNIEC benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
54 | ROMENESKO Bryce | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
56 | CARLSON Avery | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.