Glenview Park District - Glenview, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
| 2 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 3 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | - | - | - | 10% | 90% |
| 3 | HOANG Mai | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 5 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% |
| 6 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | |
| 7 | BAWA Sahana | - | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
| 8 | BURBERRY Livia | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 37% | 8% | |
| 9 | PARK Leah | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 10 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 17% | 1% |
| 11 | HAN Katherine | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 12 | STONE Sydney | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | HOANG Anh | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 35% | 3% |
| 14 | BEYER Johanna | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | BASSIK Eva | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | SKOURLETOS Maria | - | - | 3% | 15% | 39% | 41% | 3% |
| 17 | GOLLNICK Mira | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% |
| 18 | ZHENG yuqi | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 19 | PHILLIPS Hattie | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 20 | LEMASTERS Elise M. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 21 | AADHI Hansika | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | MALONE Ella | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 23 | CAMPBELL June | - | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 24 | ISHANOVA Sofia | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | CROMWELL Keira | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 1% | |
| 26 | LEE Chelsea | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 27 | DESERANNO Seren | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 28 | HOOGSTRA Lucy | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | SEO odelia | 1% | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 30 | SOLOMIE Sabina | 5% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LATIFI Fara | 28% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 32 | MORSE Katherine | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | BULLARD Sydney | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | SHEBL Nadia | 15% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | KHAN Leena | 6% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | KAISER Katherine | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | BROWNING Ruby | 45% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | ZHAO Aimee | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | KIM Claire | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | KRONZER Sophia | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.