Battle in Space City RYC/RJCC

Youth 14 Men’s Saber (Y14MS)

Saturday, September 20, 2025 at 11:30 AM

Register

University of Houston - Campus Recreation and Wellness Center - Houston, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1812 1972 - 1693
5 - 8 1618 1671 - 1572
9 - 16 1425 1596 - 1245
17 - 27 1192 1871 - 636

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Siddamshetty, Ishaan Globus Fencing Academy D25 1972 1681.30
2 Duff, Michael Globus Fencing Academy U 1735 1465.76
3 Kuang, Cyrus Globus Fencing Academy U 1847 1451.96
4 Lu, Simon Lone Star Fencing Center U 1693 1390.58
5 Kamura, Kosei Globus Fencing Academy D25 1671 1361.96
6 Shankar, Rahm Sabio Fencing Academy E25 1620 1301.18
7 Park, Jayden Globus Fencing Academy U 1607 1290.67
8 Zhang, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1572 1270.03
9 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1596 1188.35
10 Wang, Luke Globus Fencing Academy U 1577 1181.84
11 Sra, Nawab Sabio Fencing Academy E25 1489 1002.42
12 Liu, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1458 955.26
13 Kondogi, Saivarun Sabio Fencing Academy E25 1347 905.99
14 Kang, Jayden Sabio Fencing Academy E25 1361 867.39
15 Chen, Harrison Globus Fencing Academy U 1328 728.11
16 Parikh, Saavn Frisco Fencing Academy U 1245 714.64
17 Cai, Limo West Coast Fencing Academy (Austin) U 1367 606.58
18 Edelbrock, Beckett Frisco Fencing Academy U 1166 603.51
19 Kuripko, Roman Frisco Fencing Academy U 1871 531.04
20 Liu, Andy Globus Fencing Academy U 1150 517.01
21 Scott, Clark Globus Fencing Academy U 1225 508.93
22 Balagopal, Aditya Frisco Fencing Academy U 945 300.68
23 Tang, Alex Texas Fencing Academy U 1759 199.97
24 Chidambaram, Nivedh Sabio Fencing Academy U 636 53.09
25 Choi, Clayton Globus Fencing Academy U 795 < 0
26 Starling, Herbert Round Rock Fencing Club, LLC U 1058 < 0
27 Gauger, Nick Round Rock Fencing Club, LLC U 1142 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!