Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 2 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 3 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
| 3 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 65% | 21% | |
| 5 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 13% |
| 6 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 7 | ZHOU Shawn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 17% | |
| 8 | LI Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 3% |
| 9 | TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 11 | PARK Roy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 12 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 13 | PE Noah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
| 14 | FOY Grant | 100% | 77% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 15 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 18% | |
| 16 | DULAI Agam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 17 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 18 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 19 | YANG Steve | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | YE Jerry | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 21 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | HONG Edwin | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 23 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | 100% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 24 | CHEN Jason | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 25 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 26 | SUNG Ivan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 27 | LEE Abin | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | BANUELOS Dario | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LEE Euan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 30 | PARK Andrew | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | BURRES kenneth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 32 | LI Daniel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 33 | LIM Marcus | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 87% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | PHAM Atticus | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | FOLOMEEV Aleksandr | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | GOERDEL Hitchens | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | SLAIN Owen | 100% | 73% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | MA Justin | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.