Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WOODLEY Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | |
| 2 | DIMMETT David C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 62% | 15% | |
| 3 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 3 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
| 5 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | |
| 6 | STEPHENS Corbin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 5% |
| 7 | JHA Rahul | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% | |
| 8 | ZALEWSKI David | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
| 9 | ZOOK Evan D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 18% | 1% | |
| 10 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | 1% |
| 11 | WALLACE George | 100% | 96% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 12 | MCDOWELL Finn | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 13 | WOODLEY George | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 14 | ANDERSON Dean R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | 3% | |
| 15 | SEID Zachary W. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | ZELENSKY Paul | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 17 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 18 | SHOWALTER Zachary | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 5% | |
| 19 | SMYTH Sefton K. | 100% | 94% | 45% | 7% | - | - | |
| 20 | LUCOT Benjamin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 21 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 90% | 50% | 8% | - | - | |
| 22 | BARTLETT Lauren | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 23 | LUNDEN Espen | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 24 | GIAMPETRO Nicholas | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | SIMS Martin L. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.