Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | O'DONNELL Breck | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | SHEYNKMAN Leon | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 3 | WASDEN Andrew B. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 5 | SCHMIDT Victoria | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 6 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | V V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 8 | MOORE Evan M. | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 9 | SEMP Brannon A. | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | PRICE Owen | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 11 | ZIMSKY James | V D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 12 | HARTMAN Grayson | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 13 | EATON David | D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 14 | MAGGY Melanie D. | V V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 15 | CLARK Matthew | V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 16 | CLARK Robert | D D V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 17 | TREADWAY Ella | V D V V V V | D | 1.5 | 5 | +3.5 |
| 18 | MORRIS Luke | V V V V D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 19 | TEELE Porter | V V D D V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 20 | HIGGINS Jackie | D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 21 | BURNSIDE Caden | D D V V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 22 | FERGUSON Sam C. | D V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 23 | LIN Janice | V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 24 | TOLENTINO SR. Francis | D V V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 25 | ROUNTREE Andrew | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 26 | LEAKE Arlo | D V V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 27 | SHEA Aleksander | V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 28 | LAMBERT Luke | D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 29 | LOVELACE Vander | D V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 30 | HESTER Oluwaseyi (Seyi) | D D V D D D | V D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
| 31 | LABEE Lily | D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 32 | HANSON Beckett | D D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 33 | RHODES Jarreau | V V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 34 | POOLE Katherine | D D D D V | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 35 | FINN Charlotte | V D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 36 | MILLS Joshua | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 37 | VASQUEZ Jonathan | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 38 | HERNANDEZ Veronica | D D D D D D | D | 3.4 | 0 | -3.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.