Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 46% | 40% |
2 | PATIL Amulya | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 31% |
3 | KUMAR Eva | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 46% | 30% |
3 | MCSWEENEY Janie | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 26% |
5 | BENZAN India | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 15% | 2% |
6 | MARTINEZ Cecilia | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 5% | - |
7 | REKEDA Anna | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
8 | YANG Charlotte | 1% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% | - |
9 | MISHIMA Audrey | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
10 | PAN Angela | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% | - |
11 | SHANKERDAS Shreeya | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
12 | SOTELO Michelle | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
13 | ELIAS Mariella K. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
14 | FANG Kayla | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
15 | ZUCKER Emily A. | 2% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
16 | LY Hannah | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
17 | MEYER Rachel | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
18 | WANG Sijia | 42% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
19 | MEYER Rebecca | 5% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
20 | FAKTOR Emily | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
21 | GORMAN Simone | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.