Alliance Fencing Academy - Houston, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | PARKER Isaiah | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 58% |
2 | LI Tristan | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
3 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
3 | YILMAZ Tarik | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 18% |
5 | QIAN Irvine | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
5 | TUMULA Arihaan | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
7 | FALKIEWICZ Alec R. | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 2% |
8 | ROBERTS Arthur | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
9 | ZHANG Shiqi | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - |
10 | OLSON Joseph | 2% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% |
11 | WALKER Mclain | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
12 | VAN RIET Stefan | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
13 | HIGGINS SEBASTIAN | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
14 | ALI Rayan | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
15 | PLUMMER Kellan | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
16 | TORRES Alexander | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
17 | KHAVKIN Alexander | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
18 | VEERAVALLI Pranav | 15% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
19 | FULKERSON Charles | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
20 | LIU Austin | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
21 | VEGA BRANDT Luis | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
22 | GORBUNOV Gleb | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
23 | SALAKO Caleb | 13% | 43% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | DESAI Adithya | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 43% | 12% |
25 | MUTTART JR Patrick | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
26 | REYES Lucas | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
27 | CREED Dylan | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
28 | GONIMA Francisco | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
29 | FANG Daniel | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
30 | FRENCH Drake | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.