Maine West High School - Mount Prospect, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BAYVAS Lila Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | V V | V V V | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 3 | COWLES Trinity | V V | V V V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 3 | BOEHMER Bethany | V V | V | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 5 | HAYDEN Molly | V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 6 | MILLER Rose | D V | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
| 7 | SACHAR Ruhi | V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 8 | EL SHAMSY Maya | D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 9 | JHANGIANI Kavya | V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 10 | ALDORT Isabel | V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 11 | ALI-KHAN Yumna | D D | V | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 12 | CHUANG Ramona | D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 13 | HOSKINS Kendra Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | FANG Jasmine Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | KENDRICK Lauren Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | GYANG-AKOTO Nana Abena Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | BERNAL Isabella | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 18 | MARTINEZ Faith Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | HOWE Angel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | DRAGOJEVICH Jelena Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | XIE Yiling Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | ROHN Evelyn Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | ASENSO-BEDIAKO Michelle | D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 24 | SUH Ella Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | CHIYOKUBO Julia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | MOSHE Aila Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | MATSON Marina Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | TALATY Annika Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | THOMAS Paityn Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | GABEL Giselle Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | YANG Angelina | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
| 32 | SEXTONSON Addison | D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 33 | KAHE Michelle Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | ROWAN Charlee Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | HARRIS Marissa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | JAIMES Lillian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | GREGORSKI Kai Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | PERRY Abbie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | XIANG Rachel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | TRISSLER Libby Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | HOLTZ Lou Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.