The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Howard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
| 2 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% |
| 3 | KIM Andrew H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
| 3 | XU William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% |
| 5 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 6 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 89% | 52% | 15% | 1% | |
| 7 | BLINKOV Andrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% |
| 8 | GAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 9 | FALLICK Ozzie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% |
| 10 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
| 10 | SUORSA Markus | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 12 | YAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 14 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 8% | |
| 15 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 16 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | 7% |
| 17 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 17% |
| 18 | BULLARD Bennett | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 19 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% | - |
| 20 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 88% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | JAIN Aniket | 100% | 95% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | YANG Joshua | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 23 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 100% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 1% | |
| 24 | POFF James | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 25 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 3% |
| 26 | CHUA Jared | 100% | 93% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | UYANIK Muhammet | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | WANG Michael | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 30 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 99% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | LI Seth | 100% | 99% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 32 | TAN Ryan | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 33 | OLARIO Raphael | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 34 | NELSON Tony | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | FLOYD Dale | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 36 | XU James | 100% | 57% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | YAN Peter C. | 100% | 82% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | CHEN Maxwell | 100% | 4% | - | - | - | - | |
| 38 | TESOV Artem | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.