The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
2 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
3 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 35% | 5% |
3 | SADIK HANA | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
5 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% | |
6 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
7 | NGUYEN Siena | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
8 | YODER Bridget H. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 4% |
9 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
10 | KER Grace | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
11 | STONE Coral | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | |
12 | YANG Lea | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
13 | MANN Sophia J. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
14 | FLOYD Pattama (Patty) C. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
15 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
16 | XIONG Haojiao | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
17 | TONG Jessie | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | |
18 | TUNG Renee | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
19 | KYNETT Kathryn G. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 33% | 5% |
20 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
21 | TSE Angelina | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 13% |
22 | MULAGARI Sadhika | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
23 | BARNOVITZ Maya | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
24 | LIU Sydney | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
25 | CARLUCCI Laura A. | 1% | 10% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
26 | AMBALONG Jody P. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - |
26 | DANG Kelia | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
28 | JIANG Mu Jia (Michelle) | 10% | 39% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
29 | YAO Rainie | 2% | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
30 | HUAI Delilah | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
31 | IYER Arushi | 22% | 48% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
32 | TAN Adelyn | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | CHIN Elise | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
34 | DIECK Miranda P. | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
35 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
36 | RAZA Ziqra I. | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
37 | EDWARDS Darby | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
38 | RAZA Isra I. | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
39 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 32% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
40 | SNOAD Indy | 6% | 40% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
41 | SAWANT Asmi | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
42 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 12% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
43 | LUM Karen | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
44 | KIM Lauren | 9% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
45 | CHRISS Rhonda | 41% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
46 | BENT Sarah | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
47 | BERRY Sophia | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.