ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOZLOV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 2 | ARCHIBALD Zachary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 10% |
| 3 | TITOV Zachary | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 3 | HOWARTH Hayes | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 5 | MALEK Zak | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 6 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 7 | BEAL Colton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 8 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 9 | BROOKS Drake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 29% |
| 10 | LEIGH Brayden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 11 | LEE Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 12 | ALUF William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 13 | ALUF Brendon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 14 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 15 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | KOREN George | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
| 17 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | HAGN Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 19 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
| 20 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 21 | ZHAO Alexander | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | KETCHAM Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
| 23 | CHUNG Hahnsooh | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | CHAN Brady | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 25 | LIUZHANG Ben | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 26 | PARK Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 27 | ZHANG Howard | 100% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | CHEN Kevin | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | KOREN David | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | PARK Layne | 100% | 92% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | WANG Harrison | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | ZEMMAN Elliot | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | ABADIR james | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | ZHANG Mark | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 36 | BURENKOV Matthew | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | MERZLYAKOV VLadimir | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | SUH Jordan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | NARAYAN Rishi | 100% | 98% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | WANG Adam | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | DEGREGORIO Jack | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.