ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | MEHAN Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
2 | ANAND Rohan | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
3 | BRANDT Jaden | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
3 | LIN Maxim | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
5 | BERA Enzo | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
6 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
7 | ATWOOD Griffin | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
8 | SAGE Sebastian | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
9 | LIU Kevin | V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
10 | HUANG Alex F. | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
11 | NGUYEN Anthony | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
12 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
13 | LAUB William | V V V V D V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
14 | CLARK Aram | V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
15 | BONETTI Brayden | V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
16 | ANAND Rishab | D V V V D | V V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
17 | URSU Marcel T. | V V V V D V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
18 | OH Aster | V V V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
19 | CHUNG Connor | V D V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
20 | PEREIRA Beckham | V V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
21 | OLOUGHLIN Quin | D V D V V V | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
22 | AO Christopher | D V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
23 | ALLARDYCE Graham | V D V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
24 | NAYAK Surin K. | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
25 | LEE Andrew | V D V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
26 | TSAO Oliver | V V V D D | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
27 | PINTO Marcus | D V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
28 | LEE Griffin | V D D V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
29 | DE SIENA Salvatore | D V V V D D | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
30 | SAKAYEDA Jacob | V D D D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
31 | VAHABZADEH Jake R. | D D D D V | V V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
32 | SASSI Ilyas | D D D D V D | V V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
33 | MATTOO Deven | V D V V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
34 | WITCZAK Mateus | V V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
35 | MONTALVO Matthew | D V V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
36 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | V V V V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
37 | BROENING-CHAI Jonas | D V V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
38 | ALLARDYCE Lachlan | V V V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
39 | TANG Shu Hon | V V V D D V | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
40 | SHINCHUK Daniel | V V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
41 | WAXLER Ryan | D V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
42 | AYDOGDU Hakan | V V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
43 | LIGH Checed | V V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
44 | WONG Caleb W. | V D D V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
45 | DEELY Hartigan | V V D D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
46 | GOMEZ Emilio | V V D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
47 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | D V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
48 | ZHANG Ray | V V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
49 | PORTER Dupree | V V V D D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
50 | PRIEUR Christian F. | D D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
51 | BALE Atman | V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
52 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
53 | CHANG Timothy | D V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
54 | TSAO Alister | D D V D V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
55 | GERTSBERG Eli | D D D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
56 | UEMOTO Ken | D D D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
57 | CHEN Jonathan | D D V D V D | V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
58 | SHAH Sohan | V D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
59 | ONG Dylan | V D V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
60 | KIM Daehwan(Benjamin) | D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
61 | SHAPIRO Simon | D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
62 | JIANG Terence | D D D D V D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
63 | VOHRA Ekam | D D D V D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
64 | TSATSAS Andreas | D D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
65 | BHANDARE Niev | V V V D D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
66 | LIU Andrew | D D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
67 | MARTINSON Torm | D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
68 | KENNEDY Tomás | D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
69 | MAGITSKY Isaac | V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
70 | GORDON Samuel | V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
70 | CRAWFORD William | V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
72 | DIGIACOMO Dennis G. | D V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
73 | SARWAHI Viraat | D V D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
74 | JAIN Karanvir | V D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
75 | CAREY Sam | V D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
76 | CHEA Caden | D V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
76 | HU Jayden | D V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
78 | SHINCHUK Jacob | D D V V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
78 | PATEL Arush | V D D D D V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
80 | TAYCHER Aaron | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
81 | MIR Alexander | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
82 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
83 | MILLET Etienne | D D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
84 | CUSSON William | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
85 | MADHAVAN Arjun | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
86 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
87 | FARBER Jake | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
88 | SUH Leo | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
89 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
89 | TSAI Kai-An | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
91 | TUNIK Joshuah | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
92 | GRAVES Connor | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
93 | BUDAEV Artem | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.