ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 41% | 12% |
2 | REMEZA Alissa | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
3 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
3 | SONG Angela | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 43% | 15% |
5 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
6 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% |
7 | SHU Youshan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
8 | SMUK Daria A. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
9 | WITTE Vera | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
10 | TRAN Helena | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - |
11 | BRUNSON Nile | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 2% |
12 | SU Evelyn | - | 3% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 7% | |
13 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 4% |
14 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
15 | LEE Scarlett | - | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
16 | HICKS Grace | - | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 4% |
17 | AZMEH Nour | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
18 | LI Fei | - | 6% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
19 | BASRALIAN Azniv | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
20 | FENG Iris | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
21 | FENG Ge | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
22 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% |
23 | SAAL Anna | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
24 | TONG Lauren | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
25 | SUN Zeyu | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
26 | AI Amy | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
27 | REKEDA Anna | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
28 | GAO Judy | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
29 | SEREGIN Katya | 20% | 57% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
30 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 1% | 10% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
31 | MIN Melinda | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
32 | FU Yingjia | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
33 | KAUR Manroop | 12% | 48% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
34 | YANG Charlotte | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
35 | CHANG Chloe | 5% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
36 | ZHENG Linden | 1% | 10% | 44% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
37 | COSTA Leah | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
38 | MISHIMA Audrey | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
39 | SHANKERDAS Shreeya | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
40 | COLELLA Lauren | 5% | 49% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
41 | SAZONOVA Alexandra | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
42 | KIM Lilian | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
43 | SATO Elyse | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
44 | LEE Hwaeun | 26% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
45 | LEE Claudia | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
46 | MARTINEZ Cecilia | 10% | 42% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
47 | GEFFNER Olivia | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
48 | WANG Sijia | 63% | 33% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.