ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CALISE Ella | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 47% |
2 | ROY Layla | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
3 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
3 | SEO Irene Y. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% |
5 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | 2% | 18% | 41% | 33% | 6% |
6 | FIELD Julianna | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
7 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 48% | 20% |
8 | PAULUS Isabella | - | 2% | 35% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - |
9 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
10 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
11 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
12 | ZHANG Selena | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 14% | |
13 | FENG Grace | - | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 3% |
14 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% | |
15 | HAO Danica | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
16 | NEUMAN Sophie | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
17 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 42% | 17% |
18 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
19 | PAULUS Sloane E. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
20 | LI Eleanor | - | - | 5% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 3% |
21 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
22 | LI Han (Helina) | - | 4% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 4% | - |
23 | LEVY Avery | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 17% | 2% |
24 | UNGERER Frieda | - | - | 7% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
25 | WANG Amabel | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
26 | ZELDIN Nadia | 1% | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
27 | WANG Yudi | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
28 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
29 | YANG Lingting | - | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 5% |
30 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 61% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
31 | JIANG Claire | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
32 | WANG Joanna | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
33 | XIE Lillian | - | - | 13% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
34 | BERGEL Daphne | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
35 | DALBERG Meadow | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
36 | CHEN Sophie | 3% | 36% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
37 | HARRIS Julia | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
38 | LI Katerina | 1% | 14% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
39 | LOPEZ Seble | 5% | 40% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
40 | WANG Reese | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
41 | CHEN Colyi | 28% | 48% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
42 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 38% | 41% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
43 | LI Yixin Catherine | 40% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
44 | CHOI ERIN | 44% | 53% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
45 | LIU Long | 10% | 43% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
46 | LEE Allison | 51% | 47% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
47 | CHENG Isa | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
48 | TSIPORUKHA Sasha | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.