ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CLARK Aram | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
2 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
3 | ANAND Rishab | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
3 | AO Christopher | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
5 | SHAPIRO Simon | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 2% | |
6 | URSU Marcel T. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
6 | OH Aster | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 41% |
8 | SRIVATS Vedh | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
9 | CHENG Sawyer | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
10 | DOMINIQUE Remson | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
11 | SASSI Ilyas | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
12 | BIVIJI Ali | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
13 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
14 | MARTINSON Torm | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
15 | SALDARINI Glenn | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
16 | MERMEGAS Alexander | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
17 | HU Jayden | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
18 | SAGE Nikolai | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
19 | BEAL Colton | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
20 | WONG Max | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 2% |
21 | KIM Daehwan(Benjamin) | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
22 | LIU Ryan | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 4% |
23 | GORDON Samuel | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
24 | YOOK Isaac | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% | |
25 | LOO Jason | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 9% | |
26 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
27 | LUCAS William | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 3% |
28 | LEVIN Jacob | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 3% |
29 | BHANDARE Niev | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
30 | BIVIJI Adam | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
31 | FOUX Jonathan | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
32 | LIN Brendan | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
33 | TUNIK Joshuah | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
34 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
35 | ONG Dylan | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
36 | GERTSBERG Eli | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
37 | MIAO Heqi | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
38 | LEE Blake | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
39 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
40 | NG Oliver | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
41 | TRZEPLA Max | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
42 | MADHAVAN Arjun | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
43 | BARENBOYM Michael | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
44 | LOTTNER Samuel | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
45 | YOUNG Parker | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
46 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
47 | BROOKS Drake | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
48 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
49 | CHANG Timothy | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
49 | KUSHKOV Michael | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
49 | TAYCHER Aaron | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
52 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
53 | CAREY Sam | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
54 | DOSTAL Maximilian | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
55 | SHAPIRO Leo | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | - |
56 | CRAWFORD William | 43% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
57 | SUH Leo | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
58 | MALEK Zak | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
59 | EARLEY Jack | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
60 | MHLEY Gavin | 2% | 16% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
61 | GUPTA Arav | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
62 | IMANUEL Ethan | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
63 | CUSSON William | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
64 | LEE Lucas | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
65 | LEE Jason | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
66 | OREN Daniel | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
67 | O’LOUGHLIN Jacob | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
68 | PAI Ayan | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
69 | CHAVAN Aditya | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% | - |
70 | WAXLER Alex | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
71 | SAUVE Quinn | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
72 | DATTILIO Aidan | 16% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
73 | LAU Kyrus | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
74 | HAIRABEDIAN Ellis | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
75 | CHAN Ewan | 37% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
75 | HALPER Benjamin | 11% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
77 | LEE Damian | 34% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
78 | PREVOST Landon | 30% | 44% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
79 | JIA Charles | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.