Battle At The Beach ROC/RJCC

Division II Men’s Saber (DV2MS)

Sunday, August 31, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Prime F. Osborn III Convention Center - Jacksonville, FL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2497 2791 - 2263
5 - 8 2106 2181 - 2020
9 - 16 1806 1970 - 1658
17 - 24 1420 1550 - 1290

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 McGuire, Christian Stoccata Fencing Academy & Club C25 2791 2498.92
2 Shankwiler, Christopher Nellya Fencers C24 2550 2296.34
3 Liu, Victor Sigma Fencing Academy D25 2383 2125.08
4 Yadav, Lakshya Jacksonville Fencing Club C25 2263 1979.32
5 Harrington, Connor Alle Fencing Club D24 2181 1877.75
6 Balu, Aedan Research Triangle Fencing C25 2142 1828.95
7 Rinaldi, Savio Capital Fencing Academy C25 2079 1827.02
8 Wolf, Gabriel University Of Florida Fencing Club D24 2020 1614.99
9 Guydouk, Alexey Alle Fencing Club E25 1929 1567.35
10 de Souza Cabrero, Yorrick Alle Fencing Club C23 1970 1552.26
11 Parcell, Colby Miracle Fencing Club D25 1855 1548.45
12 Wasco, Andrew Stamford Fencing Center, LLC D25 1744 1392.51
13 Mannino, Miller Sigma Fencing Academy E24 1786 1376.98
14 Pak, Andrew Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1658 1277.25
15 Gleason, Sean University Of Florida Fencing Club D24 1828 1270.46
16 Toscano, Sebastian Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1677 1168.13
17 Bramlett, Myer Forge Fencing Teams DUR E25 1514 1146.75
18 Nagrani, Jai US Sabre Academy U 1549 1123.27
19 Rivera-Hernández, Javier Sword Masters Club, Orlando U 1396 971.86
20 Mottlau, Maddox Florida Fencing Academy U 1550 949.70
21 Dulay, Peter Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1473 946.33
22 Simmons, Evan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1298 762.51
23 Martin, Zak University Of Florida Fencing Club U 1290 470.18
24 Vazquez-Perez, Yeshuan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1292 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!