Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOBUS Yanka | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 12% | |
| 2 | MYRAH Vivienne | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
| 3 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
| 3 | XU Serena | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
| 5 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | 8% | |
| 6 | POHREBNA Yeva | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | |
| 7 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 8 | TANG RUIRUI | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
| 9 | BEAVER Ava | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 10 | GUAN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 11 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% | |
| 12 | JAMES Ashley | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 13 | BEATIE Isabella M. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | HABEK Sophia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 15 | HANKINS Morgan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 16 | CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 18 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 19 | KROPP Anne | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | LEE Yeriel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
| 21 | AIRES Julia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 22 | ELTERMAN Kate | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | GLATZ Alesia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 24 | ZHANG Helen | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 25 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 80% | 30% | 4% | - | - | |
| 26 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 28 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 29 | HLYNKA Marta | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | DENEALE Lucia | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | PAN Angela | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | KIM Yeryung | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | XU Jessica | 100% | 96% | 69% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | WU Michelle | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | YAKOUT Jasmine | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | LEE Brooklyn | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.