Cal Poly Recreation Center: San Luis Obispo, CA - San Luis Obispo, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | REDDINGTON aidan | D V | V V V V V | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 2 | TSANG Matthew K. | V V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 3 | GOLDADE Luke A. | V V V | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 3 | CHAN Anthony | V V | V V V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 5 | LEE Nathaniel | V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 6 | UZGIRIS Kovas | V | V D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 7 | CHEN Aaron | V V V | V V D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 8 | KALOPER Sofia | D | V V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 9 | CHEN Cynthia | V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 10 | OCKENFUSS Jeremiah J. | V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 11 | TON Kalista | V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 12 | MEINHOLD Li | V V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 13 | MEYERS Maxwell | V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 14 | HOUGHTON Zachary N. | V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 15 | FRAGALA Michael Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | RODRIGUES Vasco | D D | V D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 17 | WEBER Elias | D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 18 | JAIN Advik | D V D V | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 | |
| 19 | LI Frank Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | LAM Kellan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | WALBERT Charlotte B. | D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 22 | SPEER Mila | D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 23 | GARCIA Rowen Jared Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | MONOLAKIS Steven Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | KOSAI Jordyn M. | D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 26 | COMPERAT Etienne Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | BATHKE Tyler Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | OH Justin | D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 29 | COLLETTE Huey Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | ZHOU Steven Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | RAMIREZ Jordan | D D D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 32 | LIU Yvonne | D D D | V D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 33 | LIANG Zixuan R. | D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 34 | LEI William | D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 35 | DALAHI Joyce Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | FLAVIN Brady Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | FREEMAN Jacob Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | FU Jessica Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | YUEN Justin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | WESLING Nathan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | NGUYEN Audrey Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | WANG Nicholas Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | LUI Micah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | ZAVALA Juan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | PFEIFFER Zachary Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | SOURY Max Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.