Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | STAMOS Maria | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 2 | PRILUTSKY Sarah A. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 3 | JING Alexandra | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 3 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 5 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 6 | KIM Lauren Hyomin | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 7 | FANG Sabrina | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 8 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 9 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 4% | 24% | 44% | 26% | 3% |
| 10 | LO Ashley | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 11 | CHUSID Renata (Renata Chusid) M. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 12 | KOKES Gabrielle | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | KIM Rachael | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 15 | LEWIS Amanda N. | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 16 | NARANG Maya | 4% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 17 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
| 18 | YE Eileen | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 14% |
| 19 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 20 | SHEN Sophia H. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | KUBIT Kayleigh A. | - | 3% | 13% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
| 22 | GONG Christina S. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 23 | MOLHO Sofia | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 24 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 25 | KELLY Katherine E. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 26 | MAROTTA Veronica L. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 26 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 28 | HO Brianna W. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 4% |
| 29 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | PO Edith | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 32 | SADAN Jordan E. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | KEESING Liana | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | DU Hannah | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 36 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 35% | 43% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | POWERS Meredith R. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | WERBACH Esther | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | WU Irene M. | 21% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | ZHEN Ellen | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | SUTHERLAND Michelle J. | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.