Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 23% | |
| 2 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | |
| 3 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 3 | LI Howard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 27% | |
| 5 | SOWERS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 6 | JOO Jeein | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
| 7 | CHEN Lohen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 8 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 11% |
| 9 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 10 | WANG Zhuoyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 11 | PASTORE LIU Vince | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 33% |
| 12 | COBIAN Richard | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 13 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | 13% | |
| 14 | CAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 15 | CAO Donald | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 16 | YU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 18 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 19 | CETTO Luca | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 20 | KROON Landon | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% | 1% | |
| 21 | LI linze | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
| 22 | ZHANG Jiarui | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 24 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 25 | LI AYDEN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 26 | SLIGAR Jackson | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | RONG Jasper | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | SHA Walter | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | HONG Aidan | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 30 | YU Casey | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | WONG Ron | 100% | 96% | 72% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | ROSALES Vincent | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 13% |
| 34 | JIA Samuel | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 36 | LEIGH Edward | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 37 | CHI Everett | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MINASIAN Mason | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 6% | - | |
| 39 | EKAMBARAM Nikhil | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | ZENG Vito | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 41 | LIU Yijin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 42 | WINTERSET Mason | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | GU Andrew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | SINGHAL Armaan | 100% | 83% | 48% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | LIANG Preston | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | LI Philip | 100% | 80% | 36% | 7% | - | - | |
| 47 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | JIA David | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | TIAN Zimo | 100% | 96% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | NGUYEN Dylan | 100% | 82% | 36% | 7% | - | - | |
| 51 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | BRUM Charles E. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | SU Kingston | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 54 | HONG Arick | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.