Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Diane E. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
2 | LANZMAN Anna B. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
3 | NI Emma | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
3 | ZHANG Tina | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
5 | KUNDU Anisha | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% | |
6 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
7 | DAVIS Jessica L. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
8 | CHAN Elizabeth | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
9 | CHOI Lyla | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
10 | DE JAGER Celine | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
11 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
12 | LONG Cindy | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
13 | KOKES Ava | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
14 | MAO Amy | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
15 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
16 | WALLACE Katherine C. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
17 | COBERT Helen G. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
18 | ZHANG Maya | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
19 | MING Cynthia | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
20 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
21 | BOWIE Charlotta | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
22 | YAO Jillian | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
23 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | |
24 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
25 | DESAI Meera P. | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
26 | CHERRY Ashley A. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
27 | IGOE Nirali B. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
28 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
29 | WATSON Gabriel I. | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
30 | ALVIDREZ Francesca A. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
31 | HUH Anna | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
32 | YANG Chloe | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - | |
33 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
34 | BOOK Ayelet | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
35 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
35 | GAO Judy | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | |
37 | LIN Julia L. | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
38 | BODEN Laura N. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
39 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
40 | WELLS Emily | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
41 | SZEWC Alexandra | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
42 | RIST Rebecca (Beck) J. | 40% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | LI Alisha | 12% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
44 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 18% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
45 | ZENG Katrina | 21% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
46 | MORIN Jenna | 17% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.