The Blake School - HOPKINS CAMPUS - Hopkins, MN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WILKINS Mateo | V V V | V V V V | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 2 | OLSON Emerson | V V V | V V V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 3 | WATKINS Christian | V V V | V V V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 4 | FECHTMEYER Theodore | V V V | V V V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 5 | MARTIN William | V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 6 | HOWLAND Jonas | V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 7 | MCKINLEY Luke | V V | V V V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 8 | BREWNER Ethan | V D | V V V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 9 | GLOVER George | V V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 10 | WAKEHAM Paul | V | V D | 0.1 | 1 | +0.9 |
| 11 | PHONPRASANSACK Grayson | V V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 12 | TORCAT Pablo | V D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 13 | MENASCO Juliun | D V V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 14 | WAKEHAM Timothy | D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 15 | CHEN Weizhi | D | V V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 16 | SANDERS Jack | D V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 17 | BERSCHEID Arthur | V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 18 | GIEBLER Lucas | V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 19 | ZEITLER Blake Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | SMITH Henry | V V D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 21 | REDWING III Thomas Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 23 | WEISS Quintin | D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 24 | JARCHO Beckett Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | WOODS Jarek | D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 26 | NAIDL Josiah | D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 27 | WANG Allan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | PERES Elijah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | TAN Xinlai | D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 30 | HUANG Kai | V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 31 | HOKANSON Braddock | D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 32 | GORDON Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | IRISH Thomas | D V | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
| 34 | ZHANG Alexander Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | WUSSLER Jesse Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | FADLIA Murad Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | FERRARA Asher Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | BROWN Ian | D V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 | |
| 39 | SCHAUER Jack | D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 40 | KOOIMAN Jake Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | WILLIAMS Ethan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | PEAKE Lucas | D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 43 | MOKBEL Yassin | D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 44 | BERCHENKO Zack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | KWAN Victor | D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 46 | TORTORELLO Bear | D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 47 | NEELIMANDHU Sahil | D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 48 | AHNEMANN Leif Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 49 | PABICH Noah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | CUNEO Luca Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 51 | UNDERWOOD Dyllan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 52 | MEREDITH Jackson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 53 | HE Ethan | D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 54 | SCHRANDT James | D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 55 | SHAO Zhenghao | D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 56 | CAPERS Hunter Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 57 | BASTODKAR Ved Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 58 | DILLON Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 59 | SMITH Joseph Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 60 | WOJTALEWICZ Aiden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 61 | CLICK Cole Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 62 | ZWEBER Ben Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 63 | GARSKE James | D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 64 | ENGLERT Brayden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 65 | RUBENSTEIN Desmond | D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 66 | MEREDITH Declan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 67 | BOMGARDNER Ben Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 67 | TREAT Sam Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 69 | FEEHAN Conor Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 70 | BELL Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 71 | LOILAND Nathan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 72 | GERBER William | D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.