River City Regional Rumble RYC/RJCC/Y8

Youth 14 Women’s Saber (Y14WS)

Sunday, October 26, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1930 2016 - 1863
5 - 8 1604 1945 - 1458
9 - 16 1272 1552 - 1052
17 - 25 1235 2500 - 906

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Heath, Isabella DC Fencers Club D25 2016 1743.28
2 Vudthithamrong, Vivienne Nellya Fencers E25 1956 1666.36
3 Majewska, Maria Nova Fencing Club D25 1887 1593.97
4 Rostholder, Hannah Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1863 1572.28
5 Hu, Emily Capital Fencing Academy U 1945 1497.32
6 Guo, Yuexi Forge Fencing Teams DUR E25 1552 1150.00
7 Arango, Ivanna Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1458 1136.79
8 Topalov, Julia Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1460 1131.70
9 Chang, Kelly Miracle Fencing Club U 1533 967.98
10 Wang, Selina Capital Fencing Academy U 1363 919.70
11 Tian, Ariana Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1552 800.56
12 Johnson, Marlee Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1239 597.19
13 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1109 524.20
14 McCabe, Ashley Nova Fencing Club U 1156 453.44
15 Sirota, Simone Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1169 448.63
16 Phillippy, Hannah Capital Fencing Academy U 1052 423.61
17 Bennett, Eloise Nova Fencing Club U 1344 421.73
18 Mazzurco, Marin Miracle Fencing Club U 1037 399.76
19 Zhang, Manyao Miracle Fencing Club U 1142 285.63
20 Norris, Phoebe Alle Fencing Club U 918 144.58
21 Sadhu, Mira Capital Fencing Academy U 974 91.81
22 Ahluwalia, Vera Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 906 48.45
23 Haroyan, Lilit Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 2500 < 0
24 Cao, Amanda Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 917 < 0
25 Quilliam, Ophelia Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1377 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!