Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RASO Sofia G. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
2 | HE Fenghuan | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 27% |
3 | KIM Rachael | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
3 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
5 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% | |
6 | HUANG Natalie | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
7 | KHELFAOUI Anissa | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 29% |
8 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 6% |
9 | OH Erin H. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
10 | DU Hannah | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
11 | SHANG Andrea | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
12 | WU Irene M. | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
13 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
14 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | - | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
15 | LEE Angelina S. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
16 | GU Emily | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
17 | LI Meilin | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
18 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
19 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
20 | YU Jaime L. | - | 6% | 30% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
21 | SU Michelle | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
22 | COKER Bettina M. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
23 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
24 | LEE Ariana | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
25 | SHI Haoqing | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
26 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
27 | WU Julianna Y. | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
28 | KHELFAOUI Louiza | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
29 | LI Rachel Y. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
30 | SOLSKY Brooke A. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
31 | YU Lauren C. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
32 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
33 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
34 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
35 | BHAN Zala | 2% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
36 | CHARALEL Jessica | 15% | 55% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
37 | XIANG Emma | 4% | 21% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | ROHRING Anna L. | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
39 | GINDE Maithili | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
40 | CALVOPINA Grace Nathalie | 30% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.