Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SZEWC Alexandra | - | - | 6% | 27% | 46% | 20% |
2 | WALLACE Katherine C. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
3 | WATSON Gabriel I. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
3 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% |
5 | YANG Chloe | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
6 | MORIN Jenna | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
7 | DAVIS Jessica L. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
8 | BOOK Ayelet | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
9 | LI Alisha | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
10 | WELLS Emily | 1% | 12% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
11 | DE JAGER Celine | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 27% |
12 | MUTAKABBIR Amira | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% |
13 | BLAKE Caira | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% |
14 | BOWIE Charlotta | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
15 | LONGSTREET Olivia | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
16 | GROCE Linda J. | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
17 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 3% | 38% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
18 | GAO Judy | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 43% | 15% |
19 | CHEN Quanyou Lisa | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
20 | ZENG Katrina | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
21 | COYLE Dana | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
22 | SINGH Aayushi | 14% | 44% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
23 | ANDREEV Victoria | 1% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
24 | LI AnnieSiliang | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 36% | 9% |
25 | KORETH Maya | 7% | 33% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - |
26 | SCHMULTS Sophie W. | 6% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - |
27 | AVERBACH Margaret | 3% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
28 | RIST Rebecca (Beck) J. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% |
29 | PAN Iris | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
30 | LIU Angela | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.