Nick Itkin Cup SYC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Friday, December 5, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1716 1846 - 1669
5 - 8 1700 1912 - 1548
9 - 16 1240 1476 - 1103
17 - 30 1230 2500 - 556

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Yoo, Lucas TeamK Fencing U 1846 1583.40
2 Liu, Yihong Yang Fencing Club U 1679 1416.66
3 Yi, Alexander Fortune Fencing U 1672 1402.68
4 Fu, Benjamin Yang Fencing Club U 1669 1392.21
5 Leung, Joon Maximum Fencing Club U 1653 1333.41
6 Shen, Chris Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1912 1319.14
7 Pinchuk, Spencer Ace Fencing Academy U 1688 1289.73
8 Hong, Eason Yang Fencing Club U 1548 1151.92
9 Bush, Andrew Team Touche Fencing Center U 1476 1127.42
10 Chi, Zachary Bida Fencing Academy U 1373 1066.68
11 Li, Ethan Team Touche Fencing Center U 1271 936.26
12 Reed, Andrew Rain City Fencing Center U 1288 883.72
13 Won, Jacob LA International Fencing U 1103 735.79
14 Lau, Jesse Team Touche Fencing Center U 1176 688.31
15 Li, Jacob Kaizen Academy LLC U 1112 687.59
16 Lee, Paxton Fortune Fencing U 1123 664.20
17 Shi, Ethan Ace Fencing Academy U 1418 615.38
18 Dai, Greyson Yang Fencing Club U 1157 613.21
19 hao, hardy Yang Fencing Club U 1067 597.64
20 Zhang, Lucas LA International Fencing U 1101 592.54
21 Li, John Fortune Fencing U 1467 583.53
22 Wang, Alexander Yang Fencing Club U 1105 500.19
23 Ni, Liam Ace Fencing Academy U 1194 406.40
24 Curtiss, Cameron Elite Fencers Club U 902 232.04
25 Li, Nathan Zeting Yang Fencing Club U 809 209.85
26 Watson, Lukas Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 2500 < 0
27 Yim, Benjamin Yang Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
28 Kim, Ian LA International Fencing U 648 < 0
29 Osika, Wyatt Beverly Hills Fencers' Club U 798 < 0
30 Wan, William Yang Fencing Club U 556 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!