Texas State Recreation Center - San Marcos, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SPIER Julian | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
2 | THAYER Jake | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 35% |
3 | PARKER Riley | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
3 | POPOVICI Andrew | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% | |
5 | REINISCH Michael | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
6 | BARRERA Esperanza | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 46% | |
7 | GONZALEZ Michael | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
8 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden | - | 4% | 23% | 51% | 22% | ||
10 | BARGE Jackson | - | 2% | 21% | 47% | 26% | 3% | |
10 | HENTOSH Pierce | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 30% | |
12 | PHILLIPS Wesley | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
13 | PARK Peter | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
14 | VASYAKIN Liana | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
15 | ABBONDANZIO David | 5% | 35% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | |
16 | CARTER Tony | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
17 | YOUNG Vivian | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 34% | 6% |
18 | TALLEY Blake | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
19 | LESCURE Dimitri | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
20 | OLSON Joseph | 27% | 48% | 21% | 4% | - | ||
21 | PEREZ Ryan | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
22 | OVERCASH James | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
23 | TIEMANN Landen | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | POPOVICI Alina | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
25 | WOODALL Ian | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
26 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 22% | 45% | 28% | 5% | - | ||
27 | KOSTUSIAK Evan | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
28 | DALRYMPLE SR. Ronald W | 3% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
29 | KASKAN Peter | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 48% | ||
30 | HUDSON Ryan | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
31 | LI Zeling | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
32 | SAIKOLAPPAN Narensankar | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
33 | SABAH Alan | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
34 | JAMES Tommy | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
35 | PEREZ Daniel | 11% | 36% | 39% | 14% | - | - | |
36 | YOU Joyce | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
37 | GRIMSHAW Tim | - | 4% | 24% | 49% | 22% | 1% | |
38 | KELLEY Cathy A. | 24% | 52% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
39 | COATE Laura | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
40 | LAW Shun Yu | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
41 | NG Dylan | 6% | 42% | 44% | 8% | - | ||
42 | SCOTT Marley | 20% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
43 | SHARP Kelsey | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
44 | KENNELLY Maria | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.