Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DARINGA Arianna | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
2 | SINHA Anika | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% |
3 | LAWLOR Gillian M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% | |
3 | SHIH Christina | - | 11% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
5 | WHEELER Kira | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
6 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
7 | HAMMARBERG Shaine Trea | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
8 | GRINBERG Aliya | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
9 | YURT Leyla | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 19% |
10 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
11 | FEIGELES Carolyn A. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 28% | |
12 | MAGLIATO Julia | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
13 | JIN Olivia P. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
14 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | - | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
15 | RODGERS Sally E. | - | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
16 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
17 | YI Felicia | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
18 | CHU Catherine G. | 4% | 31% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | |
19 | MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
20 | IQBAL Sulphia | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
21 | FIDLER Sara | 34% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
22 | BHOGAL Sukhleen | 4% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
23 | PONIATOWSKI Elise | 6% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
24 | HORMEL Molly | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
25 | MORO Diana | 77% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
25 | CHINTA Ritika | 20% | 48% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.