Peoria Academy Private School - Peoria, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SENIC Lucas | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
2 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
3 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | 2% | 17% | 54% | 27% |
3 | DESERANNO Leander | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% |
5 | RUSSELL Paul | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
6 | ZHOU Justin | 3% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - |
7 | HICKEY Connor | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 6% |
8 | LATORRE Leonardo | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
9 | DEBORD Beckett | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 30% | 3% |
10 | ZMUDA Aiden | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 43% | 6% |
11 | STINNETT Brady | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 42% | 10% |
12 | BALES Gabriel | 3% | 20% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - |
13 | ELTOFT Caden | - | 5% | 27% | 46% | 20% | 2% |
14 | HICKEY Dylan | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 2% |
15 | GREULICH Nikolas | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
16 | BILLIET Greyson | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
17 | MCCONKEY Tristan | 10% | 44% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
18 | CRONK Trevor | 19% | 46% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
19 | SYMMANK Callen | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
20 | ZHANG Hanson | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
21 | HILDEBRANDT Gerhard | 18% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
22 | HASTINGS Alex | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
23 | YOUNG Jack | - | 9% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 2% |
24 | CHASE Crosby | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
25 | HALLETTMANES Ezra | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
26 | HARDWICK Alex | 13% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 1% | - |
27 | NG Gavin | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
28 | MITRA Aranya | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | - |
28 | BOEMBEKE Maxwell | 1% | 19% | 54% | 23% | 3% | - |
30 | NOTHIAS Sebastien | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.