Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 2 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
| 3 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% | |
| 3 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 5 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 6 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 7 | ZHANG Yunjia | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
| 8 | DING Abigail | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 10 | JING Emily | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 11 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 12 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 13 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 14 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 15 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 16 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
| 17 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
| 18 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 19 | DUAN Konnie | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 20 | KIM Katherine | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 21 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
| 22 | LEE Ariana | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 24 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 26 | KOROL Neta | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
| 27 | SENIC Adeline | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 28 | CHO Gracie L. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
| 29 | WANG Ellen | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 30 | CHEN Jia P. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 31 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 32 | SHIH Diane | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 33 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
| 34 | CHEN Jessie S. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 35 | KIM Rachael | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 35 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 37 | SHEN Lydia | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 38 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 39 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
| 40 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 41 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | - | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 43 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 44 | RASO Olivia | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 45 | HU Victoria | - | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 46 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 48 | CANNON Lira J. | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | OH Erin H. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 50 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 50 | SONG ShuXuan (Liliya) | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 52 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 53 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | PARK Jaimie Lina | - | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 55 | BATRA Chaahat | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 56 | MI Anning | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | UPTON Elizabeth | - | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 58 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 59 | ZHANG Rongrui | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 60 | KOROL Dana | - | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 61 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 62 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 63 | HSIUNG Samantha | 5% | 51% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 65 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 66 | FU Qihan | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 67 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 68 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 69 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 70 | LEE Bethanie | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 71 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
| 72 | SHINKAREV Olga | 13% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | GUERRA Sofia E. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 74 | YU Jaime L. | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 75 | HWANG Jungmin | - | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 76 | EYER Hailey M. | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 77 | KALE Anika A. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 78 | KOKES Gwendolen | 2% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 79 | VOITENKO AGATA | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 80 | YEN Natalie | - | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 81 | KOSLOW Amicie | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 82 | CHARALEL Jessica | 32% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 83 | TOM Caitlyn | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 84 | LEE Ji Ahn | 27% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 85 | PANT Anisha | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 86 | MI Aileen | 11% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 87 | LIN Victoria T. | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | LEE Samantha X. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 89 | JIANG Yangying (Amanda) | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 90 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 17% | 49% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 91 | YAO Ada | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 92 | SHORI Samantha | 2% | 27% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 92 | BAWA Sahana | 9% | 36% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 94 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 36% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | LI Sophia M. | 2% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 96 | SANTANGELO Aurora | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 97 | LIU Sophia | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 98 | SMITH Emilee E. | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 99 | UPTON Sydney | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 100 | PATIL Himani | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 101 | PFLAUM Philippa J. | 79% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 102 | ROHRING Anna L. | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 102 | TAN Eden E. | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 104 | GOLLNICK Mira | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 105 | MALHOTRA Simran | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 106 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 56% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 107 | LEZHAVA Nina | 44% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 108 | CHEN Miley | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.