Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 12% |
2 | ZHANG XUANYI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
3 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
3 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
5 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 22% |
6 | TSE Angelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% |
7 | GAUTAM Sahana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
8 | BLAKE Anna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 6% | |
9 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% |
10 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
11 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
12 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
13 | DENG Brooke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
14 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% |
15 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
16 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
17 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
18 | DANG Kelia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
19 | SENOGLU Irmak | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
20 | YAM Danika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
21 | CANSECO Carly | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
22 | FERNANDEZ Martina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
23 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | |
24 | ARNOLD Hali | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
25 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% |
26 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 54% | 18% |
27 | ZENG Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
28 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
29 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
30 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
31 | ATTIA Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
32 | GARRETT Madrid | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
33 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% |
34 | PABIAN Emilia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
35 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
36 | TAN Adelyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
37 | DAMBAL Sasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 7% |
38 | BERMAN greta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
39 | HUANG Rachael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
40 | WANG Callie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
41 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
42 | CHEN Kevy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
43 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
44 | CROOKS Riley | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
45 | MISHEV Lila | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
46 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
47 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
48 | ZHU TINGYI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% |
49 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
50 | TENG EMMA | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
51 | LUKER Hannah | 100% | 91% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
52 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | |
52 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | |
54 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
55 | GUVEN Coco | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
56 | DEHON Inès | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
57 | LOMOTAN Addison | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
58 | CONG Anne | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 1% |
59 | LO Chloe | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
60 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
61 | WANG Peijia | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
62 | XIE Nora | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
63 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
64 | BERRIOS Catalina | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
65 | FAVO Isabella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
66 | DANTULURI Shalini | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
67 | LIU Hannah | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
68 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - |
69 | SENGUPTA Jia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
70 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | |
71 | GOLDIN Nina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
72 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
73 | STONE Coral | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
73 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
75 | HSU leah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
75 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
77 | HU Anna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
78 | LEE Alyson | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
79 | LOO Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
80 | ZHAI AMY | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
81 | WANG Jiayi | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
82 | CAO Sophie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
83 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
84 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
85 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Adelayde | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
86 | KINKADE Ellie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
87 | CAI Veronica | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
88 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
89 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
90 | MEYERSON Michelle | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
91 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | - |
92 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
93 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
94 | MANI Francesca B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
95 | FOSS Persephone | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
96 | LI Sonia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
97 | PROBASCO Leila | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
97 | TONG Laurie | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
99 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
100 | FREEMAN Armine | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
101 | SUNG Isabella | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
102 | BAIREDDY Maya | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
103 | XU Kaylyn | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | |
104 | KWON Ava | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
105 | GAIKWAD Ashmiee | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
106 | KU Alathea-Joy | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
107 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
108 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
109 | CHEN Elaine | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
109 | FUNG Iris | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
111 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
112 | HUANG Neila | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
113 | GONZALEZ Veronika | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
114 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
115 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
115 | SHEN Emily | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
117 | PADANILAM Lily | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
118 | IANNUZZI Lucy | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
119 | MOON Claire | 100% | 83% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
120 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
121 | KIM Karen | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
122 | FAN Alexandria | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
123 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
124 | KANG Ellie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
125 | NGUYEN Madeleine | 100% | 91% | 64% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
126 | XIONG Alina | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
127 | YUEN Nicole | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
128 | WENG Amber | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
129 | LIN Annika | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | - |
130 | ZHAN Sophie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
131 | HILD Anya | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
132 | ZENG Xinyi | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
133 | SONG Emily | 100% | 72% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
134 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
135 | AWAD Royce | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
136 | CASTELO Soleil | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
137 | SEBASTIAN Ava | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
138 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
138 | MAGITSKY Leila | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
140 | KITSON Sasha | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
141 | LIU kai yin aria | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
142 | LIANG Claire | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
142 | KAUL Tara | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
144 | YE Madeleine | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
145 | WONG Charlene | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
145 | BROWN Aria | 100% | 66% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
147 | CHERON Helene | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
148 | DOLEV Rony | 100% | 97% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
149 | LEE Irene | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
149 | MACKAY Katherine | 100% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
151 | ZHANG Emily | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
152 | HAN Emma | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
153 | SEO Yunseo | 100% | 45% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
154 | RANJAN Diya | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
155 | ZAWADA Milena | 100% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
156 | KWON Ava | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
157 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
157 | SHMULER Fiona | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
159 | JUNG Sienna | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
160 | KONZEN Iris | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.