Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHOU Chenchu | - | - | - | - | 7% | 93% | |
2 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% | |
3 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
3 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 13% | |
5 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | 2% | 12% | 41% | 45% | |
6 | WANG Joanna | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% | |
7 | CASHMAN Hailey | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 18% |
8 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | - | - | 2% | 17% | 42% | 34% | 5% |
9 | YAO Abby | - | - | 6% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 2% |
10 | MA Isabelle | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
11 | WANG DINA C. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
12 | WANG Amabel | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
13 | AL-BATTAINEH Eva | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
14 | YIN Chloe | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 1% | |
15 | EYER Brooke | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 28% | |
16 | ZEE Savannah | - | - | 8% | 34% | 42% | 15% | |
17 | LI Olivia | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
18 | TSIMIKLIS aphrodite | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
19 | LI Alice | - | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
20 | LIGERET Stella | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 1% | |
21 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | - | 2% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
22 | LI Joy | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 44% | 17% | |
23 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
24 | PARK Lauren | 2% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | - | |
25 | WU Allison | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 37% | 11% | |
26 | RIVERA Leahy | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 2% | |
27 | CHANG Lydia | - | - | 7% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
28 | DENG Claire | - | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
29 | FRASER Morgan | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | - | |
30 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 38% | 11% | |
30 | LEE Zoe | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - | |
32 | TELEB Farida | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
33 | KRAHE Annika | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
34 | LIM Kensie | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
35 | YU Sophie | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 1% | |
36 | RUI Jessie | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
37 | SHAOOLIAN Alexa | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
38 | WANG Doreen | 7% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
39 | QIN Adriana | 1% | 16% | 51% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
40 | ETIKALA Saanvi | 13% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
41 | ZHOU Joi | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
42 | NAYGAS Alexandra | - | 10% | 46% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
42 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 1% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 1% | |
44 | LIM Kora | 8% | 33% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | |
45 | GOITIA Genevieve | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - | |
46 | DESAI Zoya | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | - | |
47 | FENG Esther | 27% | 46% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
48 | KIM Natalie | 6% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | |
49 | LU Keeva | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
50 | XIA Isabella | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
51 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
52 | CHEN Aimee | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
53 | LI Emma Jing | 31% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
54 | LAI Miranda | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
55 | DUVVA Sanika | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
56 | PECK Madeleine | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
57 | SOE Hayleigh | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
58 | LEE Abigail | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
59 | HU Avery | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | CHIANG Aria | 26% | 57% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | RAJ Indra | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
62 | YANG Olivia | - | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
63 | HOM Emma | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
64 | BENTLEY Amelia | 12% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
65 | CHIN Riley | 27% | 47% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
66 | LIU Doris-Zihan Zhou | 26% | 46% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
67 | BRINDAVAN Vyahriti | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
68 | FENG Christy | 54% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
69 | MADAMINOVA Ariadna | 76% | 23% | 1% | - | - | - | |
70 | ZHANG Amber | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.