Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHAMBERS Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
| 2 | KANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
| 3 | YU Ian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 3 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 5 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 6 | GU Andrew | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 7 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 8 | GRIGORIEV Roman | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% | |
| 9 | QI Jeremy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 10 | TANG Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 20% |
| 11 | WONG Hawken | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 12 | OU Rigel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | MALEK Zak | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 40% | 3% |
| 14 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | SLAVNOV Anton | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 16 | ISAYENKO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 17 | YU BOWEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 27% |
| 18 | KHANNA Adamantis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% | |
| 19 | BROOKS Drake | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 20 | AGARWAAL Yohan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 21 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 22 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 23 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 24 | LYU Tyler | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 26 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 13% | |
| 27 | KIM Eric | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 28 | CROOKS Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 29 | HOWARTH Hayes | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BIVIJI Adam | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | LI Ryan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | VIDREVICH David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 33 | DENG Richard | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 34 | HRISTOV Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | 4% |
| 35 | KOZLOV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 36 | YANG LOUIS | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 37 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 40 | HOLMES Xavier | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | D'AMELJ Edoardo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 42 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | MAI Ryan | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | KAUL Ishaan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 45 | KAMURA Kosei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 46 | RAMBHIA Smit | 100% | 91% | 64% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | PARK Emerson | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 48 | LO Lei | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | WANG David | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 50 | LAI Mars | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | HAN Kyle | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 52 | LUC Cedric | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 53 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 54 | VALLETTA John “JD” | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 55 | LEVY Daniel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 56 | JI Derek | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 57 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 58 | LEE Bill King | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 60 | THOTAKURA Sreyas | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | CHUNG Evan | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Aiden | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | YI Andrew | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 64 | XIONG Alvin | 100% | 74% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | HSIEH Maxwell | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 66 | ZHANG Caleb | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% | 1% |
| 67 | LI Kevin | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | GU Dean | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 69 | BADMUS David | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | TABANCAY Cole | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | QI Zach | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 71 | LU Simon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 73 | GUO Aiden | 100% | 96% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.