November NAC

Junior Women's Saber

Saturday, November 9, 2019 at 2:00 PM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 77%
2 TIMOFEYEV Daniella 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 58%
3 BURKE Nora S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 68%
3 YONG Erika E. 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 11%
5 HARRILL Gillian N. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 44%
6 ANGLADE Alexis C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 71%
7 JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 58%
7 LINDER Kara E. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 67%
9 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 56% 11%
10 WILLIAMS Chloe C. 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 13%
11 KIM Zoe 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 42%
12 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 47%
13 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 35%
14 TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 59%
15 BAE EMMELINE 100% 99% 88% 56% 20% 3% -
16 WHANG Rebecca 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 29%
17 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 75%
18 JOHNSON Honor B. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89%
19 YUN Joy 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 50%
20 DI PERNA Chiara I. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 71%
21 MOYA Keona L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 38%
22 KONG Vera 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 23%
23 HUANG Sharon 100% 98% 85% 50% 16% 2% -
24 LIU Lily 100% 99% 93% 71% 38% 12% 2%
25 JENKINS Ryan J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 61%
26 GOUHIN Chloe 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 54%
27 FOUR-GARCIA Madison 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 26%
28 FREEDMAN Janna N. 100% 100% 100% 93% 67% 24%
29 POSSICK Lola P. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 24%
30 GREENBAUM Ella K. 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 15% 2%
31 DELSOIN Chelsea C. 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 33% 3%
32 ENDO Miyuki N. 100% 77% 37% 10% 1% - -
33 GUTHIKONDA Nithya 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 31%
34 OLSEN Natalie J. 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 17% 2%
35 DUNGEY Amelia S. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 62% 11%
36 DUCKETT Madison 100% 98% 84% 49% 13% 1%
37 LU Vivian Y. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 25%
38 MORALES Jessica Y. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 32%
39 TIMOFEYEV Nicole 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 41% 9%
40 BLUM Leah I. 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 35% 6%
41 MOZHAEVA MARIA 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 19% 2%
42 SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 13%
43 TAO Hannah J. 100% 100% 98% 84% 50% 14% 1%
44 ANDRES Katherine A. 100% 100% 99% 88% 56% 18% 2%
45 GREENBAUM Atara R. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 24%
46 BOIS Adele 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 25% 3%
47 TURNER Zoe Y. 100% 100% 98% 84% 47% 11%
48 XU Ellen 100% 100% 95% 75% 38% 9% 1%
49 BERMAN Stella 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 38% 5%
50 OISHI Megumi 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 20%
51 WU JiaQi 100% 98% 82% 44% 12% 1% -
52 BENOIT Adelaide L. 100% 100% 94% 65% 24% 4% -
53 TONG Kunling 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 65% 20%
54 CHEN Jane 100% 97% 73% 32% 6% 1% -
55 LIN Audrey J. 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 25% 2%
56 JULIEN Michelle 100% 100% 95% 71% 33% 7% -
57 TANG Catherine H. 100% 100% 94% 70% 32% 7% -
58 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. 100% 99% 93% 69% 30% 5%
59 KOVACS Sophia 100% 100% 99% 93% 66% 22%
60 LI Anna M. 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 15%
61 HONE Katarina G. 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 19% 2%
62 GORMLEY Arwen E. 100% 99% 93% 69% 33% 8% 1%
63 FLOREZ Melissa 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 15% 1%
64 LU Amy 100% 71% 23% 3% - -
65 SHEA Erin 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 43% 8%
66 CODY Alexandra C. 100% 99% 92% 67% 32% 8% 1%
67 SHEALY Maggie 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 35% 7%
68 LIANG Megan 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 16%
69 FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 10% 1%
70 HE Charlotte 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 29% 5%
71 VAN ATTA Grace Y. 100% 100% 92% 63% 26% 6% -
72 HARRISON Imogen N. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 31%
73 HAN Jeanette X. 100% 99% 89% 60% 25% 5% -
73 GORMAN Victoria M. 100% 99% 89% 58% 22% 4% -
75 BROWN Emma 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 36% 7%
76 PAK Kaitlyn 100% 100% 98% 85% 49% 12%
77 CHIN Erika J. 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 29%
78 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. 100% 88% 52% 17% 3% -
79 REDDY Shreya 100% 100% 98% 86% 48% 12% 1%
80 MILLER Sky 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 58%
81 WEBER Juliana I. 100% 100% 97% 79% 42% 10% -
82 YAP Madeline 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 12% 1%
83 CAO Stephanie X. 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 41% 8%
84 LI Victoria J. 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 10% 1%
85 TURNOF Kayla M. 100% 98% 83% 49% 16% 2% -
86 TANG Annie L. 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 28% 5%
87 KOZAK Sonja A. 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 29% 3%
88 KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 29%
89 BALMASEDA Sabrina F. 100% 99% 89% 56% 20% 3% -
90 LIU Rachel 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 20% 2%
90 KATZ Anat 100% 100% 99% 88% 58% 20% 2%
90 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. 100% 99% 89% 60% 23% 4% -
93 BEALE Zoe M. 100% 100% 98% 84% 52% 17% 2%
94 WHELAN Brynn M. 100% 66% 15% 2% < 1% - -
95 CHEN Erica 100% 100% 97% 80% 45% 11% 1%
96 ROH Rachel E. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 44% 8%
97 TZOU Alexandra 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 40% 7%
98 DOHERTY Maverick L. 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 25% 4%
99 KIM Catherine 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 48% 11%
100 MARSEE Samantha 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3% -
101 WU Erica L. 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 17% 1%
102 WU Zoe 100% 97% 72% 31% 6% 1% -
103 CHAN Leanne 100% 99% 86% 51% 18% 3% -
104 CHEN Xinyan 100% 98% 81% 44% 12% 1% -
105 YANG Angelina 100% 96% 71% 34% 9% 1% -
106 BUCHMANN Vivien 100% 100% 100% 96% 82% 49% 13%
107 WIGGERS Susan Q. 100% 100% 100% 94% 67% 24% 2%
108 LI Amanda C. 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 25% 3%
109 LAMOTHE Laurie-Ann 100% 99% 93% 69% 34% 9% 1%
110 HOOGENDOORN Sterre 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 27% 3%
111 SHOMAN Jenna 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 10%
111 BOURGEOIS audreane 100% 76% 35% 9% 1% - -
113 FEARNS Zara A. 100% 100% 95% 67% 26% 4% -
114 CHING Sapphira S. 100% 100% 99% 91% 61% 21% 3%
115 CHAN Audrey 100% 100% 97% 80% 44% 12% 1%
116 KRYLOVA Valery 100% 87% 54% 21% 4% - -
117 LACSON Sarah 100% 100% 98% 84% 50% 17% 2%
118 LU Yi Lin 100% 97% 78% 38% 10% 1% -
119 LIN Angela 100% 98% 85% 52% 18% 3% -
120 LI Jessie 100% 93% 65% 29% 7% 1%
121 STONE Hava S. 100% 100% 98% 83% 50% 16% 2%
122 SHOMAN Miriam 100% 100% 96% 77% 43% 13% 2%
123 DEPEW Charlotte R. 100% 90% 57% 20% 4% - -
124 SHIN Andrea Y. 100% 97% 80% 43% 12% 2% -
125 KOO Samantha 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 5% -
126 WHEELER Kira 100% 78% 24% 3% - - -
127 CHANG Josephine S. 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 34% 5%
128 LUKASHENKO Angelina 100% 98% 85% 54% 20% 3% -
129 KALRA Himani V. 100% 100% 98% 85% 49% 14% 1%
130 HURST Kennedy 100% 98% 84% 49% 15% 2% -
131 CANNON Sophia E. 100% 100% 94% 71% 33% 7% -
132 YANG Kaitlyn H. 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 17% 2%
133 NEWELL Alexia C. 100% 100% 98% 82% 44% 12% 1%
134 ZINNI Kaylyn M. 100% 99% 90% 61% 26% 6% -
135 LARIMER Katherine E. 100% 100% 89% 56% 19% 3% -
136 TODD Peregrine 100% 76% 33% 8% 1% - -
137 LIN Selena 100% 92% 55% 14% 1% - -
138 VALADEZ Emily T. 100% 97% 80% 47% 16% 3% -
139 KOBERSTEIN Maggie 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 9% 1%
140 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. 100% 100% 97% 79% 44% 12% 1%
141 WANG Jianning 100% 97% 57% 17% 2% - -
142 HUANG Tina 100% 65% 22% 4% - - -
143 BENTOLILA Thalia 100% 72% 29% 6% 1% - -
144 TIBURCIO Diana 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 17% 2%
145 BAKER Audrey C. 100% 95% 71% 34% 9% 1% -
146 NOVICK Mia J. 100% 96% 68% 27% 5% - -
147 DHAR Aamina 100% 87% 50% 17% 3% - -
148 LIN Zhiyin 100% 96% 72% 33% 7% 1% -
149 YUN Maya 100% 99% 86% 53% 17% 2% -
150 HOLMES Emma 100% 82% 35% 7% 1% - -
151 BHATTACHARJEE Rhea 100% 94% 69% 32% 8% 1% -
152 ENGELMAN Madeline A. 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 5%
153 SIMONIAN Olivia A. 100% 77% 31% 6% 1% - -
154 WILSON Isley N. 100% 100% 99% 86% 53% 16% 1%
155 TUCKER Iman R. 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 14% 2%
155 SMIRNOVA Anastasiya 100% 88% 53% 18% 3% - -
157 BUHAY Rachel T. 100% 100% 95% 75% 36% 7% -
157 RHIE Lena 100% 97% 72% 34% 9% 1% -
159 KONG Isabel 100% 100% 92% 65% 27% 6% -
160 HOVERMAN Hannah A. 100% 96% 59% 20% 4% - -
161 BAKER Amelia M. 100% 50% 12% 1% - - -
162 ROBINSON Stella 100% 87% 50% 16% 3% - -
163 BILILIES Sophia 100% 95% 62% 23% 4% - -
164 PRAXL Alexa R. 100% 89% 51% 16% 3% - -
165 SATHE Mehek S. 100% 95% 71% 33% 8% 1% -
166 UNGUREANU Lisa 100% 76% 35% 9% 1% - -
167 ROGERS Pauline E. 100% 64% 17% 2% - -
168 SCHMITT Alana P. 100% 90% 58% 21% 4% -
169 HAYES Grace Y. 100% 89% 52% 15% 2% -
170 HOOGENDOORN Levi 100% 100% 97% 81% 48% 16% 2%
171 NOBREGA Carolina S. 100% 99% 84% 47% 14% 2% -
172 MATAIEV Natalie S. 100% 98% 86% 55% 20% 3% -
173 DARINGA Arianna 100% 99% 90% 59% 20% 3% -
174 LI Angela 100% 29% 4% - - - -
175 ZHANG Judy 100% 99% 82% 40% 10% 1% -
176 PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 23% 2%
177 DILLE Carolina G. 100% 49% 11% 1% - - -
178 CHIANG Emily 100% 87% 50% 16% 2% - -
179 KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) 100% 97% 81% 47% 15% 2% -
179 NI Sharon 100% 97% 70% 30% 7% 1% -
179 NYSTROM Sofia C. 100% 94% 70% 34% 10% 1% -
182 OXENSTIERNA Carolina 100% 100% 94% 69% 31% 7% 1%
182 YERRAMILLI Kavya 100% 92% 58% 21% 4% - -
184 MARQUES Hannah 100% 57% 16% 2% - - -
185 YANG Lele 100% 43% 8% 1% - - -
186 TODD Phoebe 100% 97% 66% 26% 5% - -
186 FU Linqian (Helen) 100% 69% 26% 5% 1% - -
188 ALCEBAR Kayla 100% 99% 87% 58% 23% 5% -
189 SU Emma 100% 98% 75% 31% 6% 1% -
190 CHEN Grace 100% 62% 20% 3% - - -
191 LIM Isabel K. 100% 97% 79% 47% 17% 3% -
192 GIRARDI Aemilia 100% 81% 38% 8% 1% - -
193 KIM Sujin 100% 81% 42% 11% 2% - -
194 GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. 100% 79% 37% 8% 1% -
195 JIN Olivia P. 100% 80% 39% 10% 1% -
195 SATHYANATH Kailing 100% 99% 86% 49% 14% 2%
197 YEN Natalie 100% 65% 20% 3% - - -
197 BAWA Sanya 100% 90% 49% 14% 2% - -
197 CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. 100% 98% 83% 48% 15% 2% -
200 HAMMARBERG Shaine Trea 100% 78% 37% 9% 1% - -
201 LEI Weixuan (Demi) 100% 22% 2% - - - -
202 LEZHAVA Leah 100% 23% 2% - - - -
203 NEIBART Fiona 100% 85% 48% 16% 3% - -
203 NIU Yiyi 100% 76% 32% 6% - - -
205 SHIH Christina 100% 78% 35% 8% 1% - -
205 BATRA Simran 100% 54% 13% 1% - - -
205 KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. 100% 29% 3% - - - -
205 DAVIS Charlotte 100% 37% 6% 1% - - -
209 NG Sarah W. 100% 90% 53% 17% 2% - -
209 MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. 100% 51% 13% 2% - - -
209 AHMED Amina 100% 25% 3% - - - -
212 CUNNINGHAM Erin 100% 37% 6% - - - -
213 LIGH Karis 100% 44% 6% - - - -
214 PETERSEN Kate 100% 16% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.