Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% |
| 2 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 3 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
| 3 | YONG Erika E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 13% |
| 5 | DI PERNA Chiara I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% |
| 6 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 7 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% |
| 8 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 6% |
| 9 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 10 | CHANG Josephine S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 15% |
| 11 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 12 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
| 13 | TANG Annie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 15% |
| 14 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 15 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
| 17 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 9% |
| 18 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 19 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 7% |
| 20 | YUN Maya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 38% |
| 22 | HUANG Sharon | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 24 | CHAN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 25 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 26 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 27 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 28 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 29 | YAP Madeline | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 30 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 21% |
| 31 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 32 | DHAR Aamina | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | TZOU Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 34 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 35 | JOHNSON Lauren | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 37 | REDDY Shreya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 38 | NI Sharon | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 39 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% |
| 40 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 41 | XU Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
| 42 | WEBER Juliana I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
| 43 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% |
| 44 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 45 | BEALE Zoe M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | |
| 46 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | |
| 47 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 48 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 49 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 50 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 51 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 52 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 53 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 54 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 54 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 56 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 57 | DARINGA Arianna | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 58 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 59 | KOO Samantha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 60 | LARIMER Katherine E. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 61 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 24% |
| 62 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
| 63 | JIN Olivia P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 64 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 65 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 66 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 67 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 68 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 69 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
| 70 | CHING Sapphira S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 71 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 72 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 73 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 74 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% |
| 74 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 76 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 77 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 78 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 79 | BALMASEDA Sabrina F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 79 | TUCKER Iman R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 81 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 82 | HOVERMAN Hannah A. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 83 | LIN Zhiyin | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 84 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 84 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 86 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 87 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 88 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 89 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 90 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 91 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 91 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 91 | LIN Selena | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 94 | PLONKA Kaley V. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 95 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 100% | 96% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 96 | LI Victoria J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 97 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 98 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 99 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 100 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 101 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 102 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 103 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 79% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 104 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 105 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 106 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 107 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 108 | HOLMES Emma | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | WHALEN Paige C. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 110 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 111 | FLOREZ Melissa | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
| 112 | CANNON Sophia E. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 3% | |
| 113 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 114 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 115 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 116 | YANG Angelina | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 117 | LU Amy | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 118 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 118 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
| 118 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 121 | CHEN Grace | 100% | 82% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 123 | SATHE Mehek S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 124 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 125 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 126 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 127 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 128 | FU Linqian (Helen) | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 129 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 98% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 130 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 100% | 85% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 131 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 132 | KONG Isabel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 1% |
| 133 | WILSON Isley N. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 134 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 134 | LIN Angela | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 136 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 137 | SU Emma | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 138 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 139 | WHEELER Kira | 100% | 93% | 55% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 140 | YANG Lele | 100% | 67% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 141 | NOVICK Mia J. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 142 | HURST Kennedy | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 143 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 144 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 145 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 146 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 147 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 148 | MCMAHON Byronie | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 149 | SHIH Christina | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 150 | BAKER Amelia M. | 100% | 71% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 151 | KIM Sujin | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 151 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 153 | HUANG Tina | 100% | 73% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 154 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 155 | UNGUREANU Lisa | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 156 | BATRA Simran | 100% | 54% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 157 | CUNNINGHAM Erin | 100% | 65% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 158 | LESSARD-KULCHYSKI Khloé | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 159 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 160 | OWENS Celine A. | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 161 | TODD Peregrine | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 162 | LU Elaine | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 163 | TODD Phoebe | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 164 | ADAMS Morrigan B. | 100% | 93% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 164 | SUN Jialing | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 164 | BILILIES Sophia | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 167 | MORAN Rhea | 100% | 72% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 168 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 169 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 170 | DAVIS Charlotte | 100% | 36% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 171 | PIOVANETTI Diana | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 172 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 172 | LEI Weixuan (Demi) | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 174 | ZENG Megan | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 175 | PENG Florella | 100% | 93% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 175 | CRUZ Sonia | 100% | 43% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 177 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | 100% | 57% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 177 | LIGH Karis | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 177 | STREU Mirabel | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 177 | LI Angela | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.