November NAC

Y-14 Men's Saber

Monday, November 11, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 YANG Ziyi 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 29%
2 FRISHMAN Ethan J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 58%
3 DHINGRA Gian K. 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 54% 17%
3 TANG Alex Y. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 32% 5%
5 CHANG Colin S. 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 28% 5%
6 LUKASHENKO Darii 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 24%
7 SO Hananiah 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 47%
8 CHAN Matthew 100% 100% 99% 93% 74% 40% 10%
9 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 45%
10 WU MENGKE 100% 100% 100% 97% 86% 56% 19%
11 LINSKY Matthew 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 37%
12 LE Hayden 100% 100% 100% 95% 78% 43% 11%
13 YANG Duncan 100% 100% 95% 80% 50% 20% 3%
14 BERMAN Luca 100% 100% 99% 89% 61% 26% 5%
15 KOGAN Benjamin 100% 98% 87% 60% 28% 7% 1%
16 GINIS Nathan 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 35%
17 BERRIO Carter E. 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 42% 11%
17 CHEN Oscar 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 44% 12%
19 GOERING Ashton H. 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 7% 1%
20 CHEONG Heonjae 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 38% 8%
21 SKINNER Graham B. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 35%
22 LINDHOLM Oliver S. 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3%
23 GUZZO Vito 100% 99% 88% 58% 23% 4% -
24 WOODWARD Connor 100% 100% 96% 76% 38% 8%
25 ZUBATIY Samuel 100% 100% 95% 76% 43% 14% 2%
26 TONG ZACHARY 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 38% 8%
27 LICHT Aaron H. 100% 98% 86% 59% 27% 7% 1%
28 CHON Taylor A. 100% 100% 98% 85% 56% 22% 3%
29 LUO George F. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 34% 7%
30 XU Andrew 100% 97% 83% 53% 23% 5% 1%
31 BEAULAC Stephane 100% 100% 96% 82% 53% 21% 4%
32 BUCHMANN Finn D. 100% 100% 95% 79% 49% 19% 3%
33 POPE Nico 100% 100% 99% 94% 77% 44% 12%
33 MORRILL William 100% 100% 96% 80% 50% 19% 3%
35 FERNANDEZ Rodrigo 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 35%
35 WILSON Jude 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 46%
37 GREENBAUM Ian L. 100% 98% 83% 49% 16% 2%
38 KIM Alexander M. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 44% 11%
39 TANN Justin 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 20%
40 JI Cody Walter 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 19%
40 HONG Steven 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 15% 2%
42 COLE Alexander 100% 100% 97% 80% 46% 15% 2%
43 HONG Vincent Q. 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 21% 2%
44 MAKLIN Edward P. 100% 100% 96% 82% 51% 19% 3%
45 KIM-COGAN Ryan 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 33% 6%
46 NAZLYMOV Andrei 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 22% 4%
47 CHAVES Matthew J. 100% 99% 90% 65% 31% 9% 1%
48 FENG Leo 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 30% 5%
49 KEEFE Duncan 100% 100% 98% 87% 61% 27% 5%
50 JAWOROWSKI Matthew 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 18% 2%
51 WANG Charles 100% 99% 89% 59% 23% 4% -
52 XU William 100% 98% 83% 47% 14% 2%
53 ERMAKOV Lev 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 27%
54 GHENEA George Philipe 100% 98% 80% 40% 10% 1%
55 LIU Christopher X. 100% 100% 97% 85% 57% 23% 4%
56 YUN Jake 100% 99% 90% 65% 33% 9% 1%
57 ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. 100% 99% 95% 76% 44% 14% 2%
58 CHAN Aidan 100% 92% 64% 29% 7% 1% -
59 AVAKIAN Alec 100% 100% 94% 68% 28% 4%
60 OWENS Harrison J. 100% 97% 70% 28% 5% -
61 BONSELL Vance 100% 98% 80% 40% 11% 1% -
62 EICHHORN Lukas H. 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 8%
63 DU Gavin J. 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 11% 1%
64 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 100% 96% 70% 30% 7% 1% -
65 LEE Justin 100% 100% 94% 70% 31% 5%
66 ZHOU Miles 100% 99% 89% 62% 29% 7% 1%
67 HOUTZ Jackson 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 10%
68 SIMAK Joseph P. 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 40% 10%
69 SHTEYN Mark 100% 99% 89% 63% 30% 8% 1%
70 CONINE Tanner C. 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 19% 2%
71 OVERDECK Andrew 100% 97% 80% 46% 15% 2% -
72 HUANG Alexander C. 100% 100% 98% 84% 51% 17% 2%
73 BULL Anderson 100% 99% 93% 71% 38% 12% 2%
74 SHERWOOD Hayden F. 100% 99% 90% 64% 31% 8% 1%
75 DENG Andrew 100% 100% 95% 77% 45% 15% 2%
76 ZHANG Jeffrey 100% 97% 81% 51% 20% 5% -
77 DENNER Maximilian P. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 16%
78 LUTHRA Arjun 100% 100% 95% 78% 47% 17% 3%
79 LIU Mingyang Ryan 100% 94% 60% 20% 3% - -
80 KIM Shaun M. 100% 99% 90% 60% 22% 3%
81 HUANG Ethan F. 100% 99% 90% 61% 23% 3%
82 GHAYALOD ansh 100% 100% 97% 78% 38% 7%
83 CHENG Kyle 100% 93% 66% 29% 7% 1%
84 PIWOWAR Alex 100% 85% 49% 16% 3% -
85 SPRINGER Patrick 100% 50% 12% 2% - -
86 ROSBERG Dashiell W. 100% 100% 97% 81% 45% 11%
87 YOO Joshua H. 100% 82% 39% 9% 1% -
88 LEE Aydan J. 100% 100% 99% 88% 57% 20% 3%
89 ZHANG Derek 100% 84% 43% 12% 2% - -
90 POSY Daniel 100% 93% 45% 11% 1% - -
91 CHEN Leo 100% 99% 93% 72% 40% 13% 2%
92 SANDERS Samuel B. 100% 96% 74% 36% 10% 1% -
93 HAO Anwen 100% 100% 95% 67% 29% 7% 1%
94 HAN Edward 100% 97% 77% 40% 11% 1% -
95 NOBLE Colin 100% 99% 91% 64% 28% 7% 1%
96 ZENG Noah 100% 92% 67% 33% 10% 2% -
97 FERNANDEZ Liam 100% 82% 44% 14% 2% - -
98 JEON Daniel 100% 92% 65% 31% 9% 1% -
99 LEUNG Nathan 100% 85% 48% 16% 3% - -
100 MYLEK Peter 100% 98% 87% 59% 26% 6% 1%
101 WANG Andy 100% 94% 69% 33% 8% 1% -
102 HOLZ William A. 100% 98% 85% 57% 26% 7% 1%
103 LUHMAN Gabriel 100% 40% 7% 1% - - -
104 RHEE Ethan N. 100% 98% 86% 52% 17% 3% -
105 SMITH Vaughn 100% 82% 42% 12% 2% - -
106 BEITEL Noah 100% 25% 3% - - -
107 PANDEY Neil 100% 89% 55% 20% 4% -
108 KILGALLEN William 100% 99% 89% 62% 27% 6% -
109 WANG Nicolas 100% 98% 83% 52% 20% 4% -
110 LOPEZ Lucas M. 100% 70% 29% 7% 1% - -
111 WU Richard 100% 96% 70% 31% 7% 1% -
112 LU Caleb Q. 100% 88% 57% 23% 5% 1% -
113 CHEONG Heonjun 100% 98% 86% 57% 24% 6% 1%
114 MORALES Jonathan 100% 87% 45% 13% 2% - -
115 RYAN Will 100% 52% 12% 1% - - -
115 MOULTON Ian 100% 73% 31% 7% 1% - -
117 STONE Esmond A. 100% 87% 54% 22% 5% 1% -
118 MALONE Gregory D. 100% 98% 87% 56% 23% 5% -
119 RASMUSSEN Oliver 100% 80% 39% 11% 2% - -
120 BLEYMAN David 100% 61% 21% 4% - - -
120 ALTIRS Giorgio 100% 67% 23% 4% - - -
122 ZHANG Michael (Jiayuan) 100% 94% 56% 18% 3% -
123 KUMAR Sachit 100% 31% 4% - - - -
124 AKS Ari 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3% -
125 DILLE Jackson K. 100% 66% 23% 4% - -
126 WANG YiLe(Justin) 100% 63% 22% 4% 1% - -
126 GIANETTO Ethan K. 100% 91% 64% 31% 9% 1% -
128 WEIL Asher D. 100% 47% 10% 1% - - -
129 SUSTAR Mir 100% 17% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.