MSA Sports Spot - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 2 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
| 3 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 3 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 26% |
| 5 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 6 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 7 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
| 8 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 9 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% |
| 10 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 11 | MODADUGU Aryan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 12 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 13 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 9% |
| 14 | HEYBOER Jason | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 15 | KNIBBE Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 17 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 16% |
| 18 | FRASER Rhys | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | OZAWA Taishi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 20 | HONG Derek | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | HOWLAND Jonas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
| 22 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 2% |
| 24 | TURNER Jackson | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 25 | TAMIYA Masao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 3% |
| 26 | TATE Liam | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | - |
| 27 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 28 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 17% |
| 29 | BASS Evan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 30 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | TATE Linus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | HERRERA Xavier | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 33 | JOYCE Ryan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 34 | ZHANG Hanson | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 35 | KOLACKI Gabriel | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | BANNICK Evan | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 37 | WENGER Liam | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 37 | MOLDOVEANU Roman | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 40 | GOSTRYY Grigory | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | DAVIS Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 2% |
| 42 | NI Aaric | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | GREULICH Nikolas | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | LIM-SEIWERT Tristan | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | IBRAHIM Khaden | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | CHASE Crosby | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | STREETER Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% | 1% |
| 48 | RYKSE James | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | NG Gavin | 100% | 91% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | GONZALEZ Rocky | 100% | 87% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | CARLSON Avery | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | DIFRANK Tae | 100% | 85% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | MONELLI Mathias | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 54 | GOGOI Kavi | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 54 | TICHENOR Abreham | 100% | 99% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | TERPSTRA Clive | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.