Fairfax Challenge ROC, RJCC, RYC

Youth 14 Women’s Saber (Y14WS)

Saturday, January 3, 2026 at 11:00 AM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1952 2069 - 1778
5 - 8 1658 1729 - 1530
9 - 16 1385 1599 - 1133
17 - 27 1417 2758 - 791

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Yadav, Tishya Jacksonville Fencing Club C25 2011 1755.08
2 Hu, Emily Capital Fencing Academy D25 2069 1717.51
3 Majewska, Maria Nova Fencing Club D25 1952 1673.82
4 Ta-Zhou, Sophia Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E25 1778 1521.61
5 Radell, Zoe Capital Fencing Academy U 1696 1403.99
6 Ono, Lisa Manhattan Fencing Center U 1729 1332.99
7 Jung, Elise Allegro Fencing Center E25 1679 1268.86
8 Topalov, Julia Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1530 1250.47
9 Guo, Yuexi Forge Fencing Teams DUR E25 1516 1166.82
10 Yao, Elizabeth Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1434 1122.02
11 Chang, Kelly Miracle Fencing Club U 1599 1095.04
12 Arango, Ivanna Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1378 1077.79
13 Wang, Selina Capital Fencing Academy U 1271 868.22
14 Piñol, Annika National Capital Fencers Club U 1481 808.86
15 Sager, Bianca Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1133 698.24
16 Zhang, Manyao Miracle Fencing Club E25 1265 660.51
17 Phillippy, Hannah Capital Fencing Academy U 1161 652.77
18 Wang, Emily Capital Fencing Academy U 2758 634.27
19 Jeon, Kristen Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1260 606.65
20 Mazzurco, Marin Miracle Fencing Club U 1111 552.77
21 Chen, Jolene Nellya Fencers U 1537 533.63
22 McCabe, Ashley Nova Fencing Club U 1114 433.42
23 Norris, Phoebe Alle Fencing Club U 872 329.22
24 Jeon, Karis Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1055 290.89
25 Sadhu, Mira Capital Fencing Academy U 791 42.27
26 Waterworth, Clover Nova Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
27 Mazzurco, Sydney Miracle Fencing Club U 1430 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!