Fairfax Challenge ROC, RJCC, RYC

Junior Men’s Saber (JNRMS)

Sunday, January 4, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2666 2940 - 2371
5 - 8 2243 2341 - 2164
9 - 16 1996 2160 - 1874
17 - 27 1663 1915 - 1009

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Su, Landon Miracle Fencing Club A25 2940 2677.43
2 Yan, William Nazlymov Fencing Foundation A25 2804 2546.52
3 Deck, Tyson Forge Fencing Teams DUR B24 2550 2296.52
4 Yadav, Lakshya Jacksonville Fencing Club C25 2371 2105.97
5 Lin, Felix Miracle Fencing Club C25 2341 2083.99
6 Ji, Johnson American Institute Of Fencing C25 2272 2021.00
7 Chang, Ethan Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2196 1938.27
8 wang, Max Capital Fencing Academy C25 2164 1907.67
9 Feng, Brendan Miracle Fencing Club C25 2160 1906.67
10 Perrin, Leo Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D25 2101 1811.56
11 D'Amelj, Edoardo Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2025 1771.68
12 Parcell, Colby Miracle Fencing Club C25 2038 1763.66
13 Bukzin, Alan Nova Fencing Club D25 1972 1688.82
14 Breuer, Daniel Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 1913 1637.36
15 Liu, Jayden Capital Fencing Academy D25 1881 1618.44
16 Liu, Guanyu Globus Fencing Academy D25 1874 1604.91
17 Rehm, Liam Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E25 1904 1604.56
18 Benson, Jacob Nova Fencing Club D25 1915 1590.09
19 Bialik, Noah Fencing Club Asheville C25 1895 1548.46
20 Moon, Noah Nova Fencing Club D25 1870 1530.76
21 Wang, Ziyao Miracle Fencing Club E25 1788 1475.82
22 Toscano, Sebastian Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1789 1467.50
23 Mattingly, Ian E25 1591 1189.78
24 Howerton, Beckett Miracle Fencing Club U 1515 1089.53
25 Leung, Arthur Scarsdale Fencing Center U 1598 964.21
26 Ellis, Bremmen U 1414 881.89
27 Michalski, Brandon Nova Fencing Club U 1009 373.70

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!