Fairfax Challenge ROC, RJCC, RYC

Junior Men’s Saber (JNRMS)

Sunday, January 4, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2656 2941 - 2395
5 - 8 2193 2305 - 2086
9 - 16 1967 2083 - 1867
17 - 27 1561 1868 - 1044

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Su, Landon Miracle Fencing Club A25 2941 2676.48
2 Yan, William Nazlymov Fencing Foundation A25 2765 2507.67
3 Deck, Tyson Forge Fencing Teams DUR B24 2525 2269.17
4 Yadav, Lakshya Jacksonville Fencing Club C25 2395 2126.18
5 Lin, Felix Miracle Fencing Club C25 2305 2047.02
6 Ji, Johnson American Institute Of Fencing C25 2203 1948.60
7 Chang, Ethan Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2179 1917.88
8 Feng, Brendan Miracle Fencing Club C25 2086 1830.64
9 D'Amelj, Edoardo Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2061 1804.60
10 Perrin, Leo Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D25 2083 1784.35
11 Parcell, Colby Miracle Fencing Club C25 2024 1743.24
12 Breuer, Daniel Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 1919 1638.97
13 Bukzin, Alan Nova Fencing Club D25 1927 1624.50
14 Rehm, Liam Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E25 1920 1617.02
15 Liu, Jayden Capital Fencing Academy D25 1867 1600.51
16 Bialik, Noah Fencing Club Asheville C25 1933 1577.15
17 Liu, Guanyu Globus Fencing Academy D25 1840 1564.38
18 Benson, Jacob Nova Fencing Club D25 1868 1530.69
19 Moon, Noah Nova Fencing Club D25 1867 1491.37
20 Toscano, Sebastian Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1806 1462.23
21 Mattingly, Ian E25 1641 1228.65
22 Wang, Ziyao Miracle Fencing Club E25 1572 1199.88
23 Howerton, Beckett Miracle Fencing Club U 1524 1048.45
24 Leung, Arthur Scarsdale Fencing Center U 1560 776.71
25 Ellis, Bremmen U 1395 772.02
26 Prosper, Nathaniel Nova Fencing Club U 1052 551.68
27 Michalski, Brandon Nova Fencing Club U 1044 387.87

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!