Fairfax Challenge ROC, RJCC, RYC

Junior Men’s Saber (JNRMS)

Sunday, January 4, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2668 2940 - 2368
5 - 8 2259 2371 - 2160
9 - 16 1994 2147 - 1877
17 - 27 1678 1915 - 1009

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Su, Landon Miracle Fencing Club A25 2940 2677.43
2 Yan, William Nazlymov Fencing Foundation A25 2812 2554.34
3 Deck, Tyson Forge Fencing Teams DUR B24 2550 2296.52
4 Lin, Felix Miracle Fencing Club C25 2368 2111.83
5 Yadav, Lakshya Jacksonville Fencing Club C25 2371 2105.97
6 Ji, Johnson American Institute Of Fencing C25 2296 2044.07
7 Chang, Ethan Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2210 1953.77
8 Feng, Brendan Miracle Fencing Club C25 2160 1906.67
9 wang, Max Capital Fencing Academy C25 2147 1891.51
10 Parcell, Colby Miracle Fencing Club C25 2091 1818.41
11 Perrin, Leo Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D25 2088 1805.70
12 D'Amelj, Edoardo Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2010 1757.62
13 Bukzin, Alan Nova Fencing Club D25 1951 1670.57
14 Breuer, Daniel Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 1904 1628.91
15 Liu, Jayden Capital Fencing Academy D25 1883 1621.38
16 Liu, Guanyu Globus Fencing Academy D25 1877 1610.30
17 Rehm, Liam Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E25 1904 1604.56
18 Benson, Jacob Nova Fencing Club D25 1915 1590.09
19 Moon, Noah Nova Fencing Club D25 1882 1557.75
20 Bialik, Noah Fencing Club Asheville C25 1895 1548.46
21 Wang, Ziyao Miracle Fencing Club E25 1796 1488.95
22 Toscano, Sebastian Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1774 1454.08
23 Mattingly, Ian E25 1591 1189.78
24 Leung, Arthur Scarsdale Fencing Center U 1695 1163.76
25 Howerton, Beckett Miracle Fencing Club U 1535 1119.89
26 Ellis, Bremmen U 1457 956.50
27 Michalski, Brandon Nova Fencing Club U 1009 373.70

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!